The Lancet. Oncology 2010-10
Sentinel-lymph-node resection compared with conventional axillary-lymph-node dissection in clinically node-negative patients with breast cancer: overall survival findings from the NSABP B-32 randomised phase 3 trial.
Abstract
Background
Sentinel-lymph-node (SLN) surgery was designed to minimise the side-effects of lymph-node surgery but still offer outcomes equivalent to axillary-lymph-node dissection (ALND). The aims of National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) trial B-32 were to establish whether SLN resection in patients with breast cancer achieves the same survival and regional control as ALND, but with fewer side-effects.
Methods
NSABP B-32 was a randomised controlled phase 3 trial done at 80 centres in Canada and the USA between May 1, 1999, and Feb 29, 2004. Women with invasive breast cancer were randomly assigned to either SLN resection plus ALND (group 1) or to SLN resection alone with ALND only if the SLNs were positive (group 2). Random assignment was done at the NSABP Biostatistical Center (Pittsburgh, PA, USA) with a biased coin minimisation approach in an allocation ratio of 1:1. Stratification variables were age at entry (≤ 49 years, ≥ 50 years), clinical tumour size (≤ 2·0 cm, 2·1-4·0 cm, ≥ 4·1 cm), and surgical plan (lumpectomy, mastectomy). SLN resection was done with a blue dye and radioactive tracer. Outcome analyses were done in patients who were assessed as having pathologically negative sentinel nodes and for whom follow-up data were available. The primary endpoint was overall survival. Analyses were done on an intention-to-treat basis. All deaths, irrespective of cause, were included. The mean time on study for the SLN-negative patients with follow-up information was 95·6 months (range 70·1-126·7). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00003830.
Findings
5611 women were randomly assigned to the treatment groups, 3989 had pathologically negative SLN. 309 deaths were reported in the 3986 SLN-negative patients with follow-up information: 140 of 1975 patients in group 1 and 169 of 2011 in group 2. Log-rank comparison of overall survival in groups 1 and 2 yielded an unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 1·20 (95% CI 0·96-1·50; p=0·12). 8-year Kaplan-Meier estimates for overall survival were 91·8% (95% CI 90·4-93·3) in group 1 and 90·3% (88·8-91·8) in group 2. Treatment comparisons for disease-free survival yielded an unadjusted HR of 1·05 (95% CI 0·90-1·22; p=0·54). 8-year Kaplan-Meier estimates for disease-free survival were 82·4% (80·5-84·4) in group 1 and 81·5% (79·6-83·4) in group 2. There were eight regional-node recurrences as first events in group 1 and 14 in group 2 (p=0·22). Patients are continuing follow-up for longer-term assessment of survival and regional control. The most common adverse events were allergic reactions, mostly related to the administration of the blue dye.
Interpretation
Overall survival, disease-free survival, and regional control were statistically equivalent between groups. When the SLN is negative, SLN surgery alone with no further ALND is an appropriate, safe, and effective therapy for breast cancer patients with clinically negative lymph nodes.
Funding
US Public Health Service, National Cancer Institute, and Department of Health and Human Services.
Related Questions
Would you send Oncotype for pre-menopausal women with HR+, HER2(-) breast cancer with a small tumor (pT1b) and micrometastatic LN involvement or recommend adjuvant chemotherapy without sending Oncotype?
That is a very good question, especially considering that the RxPONDER trial showed benefit from chemotherapy in pre-menopausal women with 1-3 lymph nodes involved by breast cancer. However, this trial excluded patients who had micro-metastatic disease as the only nodal involvement, so we can't appl...
Do you recommend sentinel node biopsy or ALND in cT4 or cT3 cN0 breast cancer patients?
The major trials comparing SLNB versus ALND (i.e., Table 1 from Lyman et al. 2014) either required tumors to be small (<= 2-3 cm), or had few patients with larger tumors (e.g., NSABP B-32: less than 2% with tumor > 4 cm; ALMANAC: 2% with tumor > 5 cm). Similarly, the major surgical trials comparing ...
What neoadjuvant therapy would you choose for a post menopausal woman with ER negative, PR positive high grade node negative breast cancer?
Assuming that there is no reason to doubt the results of the hormone receptor testing, and her HER2 is negative, I would treat her the same way I would a triple-negative cancer—I would not bother to send Oncotype as it should be high with the negative ER, and I wouldn't believe it if it came back lo...