N Engl J Med
Sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.
Abstract
Background
No effective systemic therapy exists for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. A preliminary study suggested that sorafenib, an oral multikinase inhibitor of the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor, the platelet-derived growth factor receptor, and Raf may be effective in hepatocellular carcinoma.
Methods
In this multicenter, phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we randomly assigned 602 patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma who had not received previous systemic treatment to receive either sorafenib (at a dose of 400 mg twice daily) or placebo. Primary outcomes were overall survival and the time to symptomatic progression. Secondary outcomes included the time to radiologic progression and safety.
Results
At the second planned interim analysis, 321 deaths had occurred, and the study was stopped. Median overall survival was 10.7 months in the sorafenib group and 7.9 months in the placebo group (hazard ratio in the sorafenib group, 0.69; 95% confidence interval, 0.55 to 0.87; P<0.001). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the median time to symptomatic progression (4.1 months vs. 4.9 months, respectively, P=0.77). The median time to radiologic progression was 5.5 months in the sorafenib group and 2.8 months in the placebo group (P<0.001). Seven patients in the sorafenib group (2%) and two patients in the placebo group (1%) had a partial response; no patients had a complete response. Diarrhea, weight loss, hand-foot skin reaction, and hypophosphatemia were more frequent in the sorafenib group.
Conclusions
In patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, median survival and the time to radiologic progression were nearly 3 months longer for patients treated with sorafenib than for those given placebo. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00105443.)
Related Questions
What is your platelet cutoff for atezolizumab + bevacizumab in HCC in the absence of bleeding (variceal or otherwise)?
The platelet eligibility for IMBrave150 was 75K, I believe. Eligibility in the original SHARP trial was 60K, so I often consider somewhere around 60K. Although if truly no varices on EGD and no history of bleeding, I might consider down to 50K. Lower than that, I would probably think single agent ch...
What is your preferred second line therapy for an HCC patient who progressed after first line checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy?
After progression on immunotherapy monotherapy, assuming the patient is still eligible for further therapy and VEGF inhibition, I will move to a VEGF TKI. While the data supports the use of lenvatinib or sorafenib in the front-line setting (REFLECT and SHARP trials), I will use one of these agents (...