Mednet Logo

Abstract

Introduction

The role of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for tumors involving the chest wall (CW) remains ill-defined. The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 0236 trial allowed inclusion of T3N0 non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) < 5 cm, although ultimately none were enrolled. No published data set investigating this population is available.

Materials and methods

We queried an institutional review board-approved prospective SBRT registry to identify patients with tumors involving the CW, defined as radiographic evidence of frank soft tissue invasion or bony destruction. All patients underwent SBRT to a median dose of 50 Gy in 5 fractions and were followed up for tumor control, pain response, and toxicity.

Results

Of 820 NSCLC patients reviewed, 13 with CW involvement were identified. Of these 13 patients, 10 had primary T3N0 NSCLC and 3 had recurrent NSCLC. Their median age was 78 years, the Karnofsky performance status was 80, the Charlson score was 3, and the tumor diameter was 4.0 cm. The 1-year local, locoregional, and distant control rates were 89%, 62%, 80%, respectively. Of 9 patients with pretreatment tumor-related CW pain, 7 (78%) reported improvement after treatment. Regarding toxicity, 2 of 13 (15%) experienced new or worsening CW pain (both grade ≤ 2); 3 cases (23%) of grade 1-2 radiation pneumonitis developed. No patient exhibited late skin changes or fibrosis.

Conclusion

SBRT for NSCLC involving the CW was well tolerated, with promising early rates of tumor control and no grade ≥ 3 toxicity. Tumor-related CW pain was relieved in most patients, and the treatment-related toxicity rates appeared acceptable. Further investigation in this subset of patients with NSCLC is warranted.

Related Questions

Is SBRT an option for a paravertebral lung cancer with vertebral body and rib invasion for patients who are not chemo candidates?

1
1 Answers

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Radiation Oncology · Cleveland Clinic

I do believe SBRT is an option for paravertebral lung cancer with VB and rib invasion. My rationale is that SBRT offers improved local control and cancer outcome compared to conventionally fractionated radiation - and that while there may be potential for increased toxicity of treatment in this scen...

Is surgery preferable over SBRT for peripheral NSCLC invading into ribs?

3
4 Answers

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Radiation Oncology · University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

There is not much data about SBRT in tumor invading the rib. Technically, this is T3 disease. There are three uncertainties: 1. Chest wall toxicity. 2. Tumor contour and margin. 3. Optimal dose. Since surgical resection remains the standard care for operable disease, without further data, I would vo...

How do you approach treatment for isolated lung recurrences in patients that did not tolerate chemotherapy after lobectomy?

1 Answers

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Radiation Oncology · University of Wisconsin Hospital & Clinics

For non-small cell lung cancer recurrences after lobectomy I approach them the same way as a newly diagnosed NSCLC. If the lymph nodes are negative and the recurrence is small and away from the hilum and central structures, I would recommend SBRT, 50 Gy in 5 fractions. If the lymph nodes are negativ...

What is the optimal treatment of medically inoperable T3N0 non-small cell lung cancer that is too large for standard SBRT?

6
4 Answers

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Radiation Oncology · Quillen VA Medical Center

As we see it, there is more than one way to skin the cat. RTOG 0617 has condemned protracted fractions to 70 Gy...it just might be that 70 Gy is the wrong way to treat in 35 fractions, +/- cetuximab added to weakly carbo taxol. But the study to look at thoracic dose is contaminated by those systemic...