Mednet Logo

Abstract

Background

Trials have evaluated the use of clopidogrel and aspirin to prevent stroke after an ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA). In a previous trial, ticagrelor was not better than aspirin in preventing vascular events or death after stroke or TIA. The effect of the combination of ticagrelor and aspirin on prevention of stroke has not been well studied.

Methods

We conducted a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial involving patients who had had a mild-to-moderate acute noncardioembolic ischemic stroke, with a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score of 5 or less (range, 0 to 42, with higher scores indicating more severe stroke), or TIA and who were not undergoing thrombolysis or thrombectomy. The patients were assigned within 24 hours after symptom onset, in a 1:1 ratio, to receive a 30-day regimen of either ticagrelor (180-mg loading dose followed by 90 mg twice daily) plus aspirin (300 to 325 mg on the first day followed by 75 to 100 mg daily) or matching placebo plus aspirin. The primary outcome was a composite of stroke or death within 30 days. Secondary outcomes were first subsequent ischemic stroke and the incidence of disability within 30 days. The primary safety outcome was severe bleeding.

Results

A total of 11,016 patients underwent randomization (5523 in the ticagrelor-aspirin group and 5493 in the aspirin group). A primary-outcome event occurred in 303 patients (5.5%) in the ticagrelor-aspirin group and in 362 patients (6.6%) in the aspirin group (hazard ratio, 0.83; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.71 to 0.96; P = 0.02). Ischemic stroke occurred in 276 patients (5.0%) in the ticagrelor-aspirin group and in 345 patients (6.3%) in the aspirin group (hazard ratio, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.68 to 0.93; P = 0.004). The incidence of disability did not differ significantly between the two groups. Severe bleeding occurred in 28 patients (0.5%) in the ticagrelor-aspirin group and in 7 patients (0.1%) in the aspirin group (P = 0.001).

Conclusions

Among patients with a mild-to-moderate acute noncardioembolic ischemic stroke (NIHSS score ≤5) or TIA who were not undergoing intravenous or endovascular thrombolysis, the risk of the composite of stroke or death within 30 days was lower with ticagrelor-aspirin than with aspirin alone, but the incidence of disability did not differ significantly between the two groups. Severe bleeding was more frequent with ticagrelor. (Funded by AstraZeneca; THALES ClinicalTrial.gov number, NCT03354429.).

Related Questions

Would you consider dual antiplatelet therapy for stroke prevention for ICAD in patients with a history of SAH?

2 Answers

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Neurology · Shaare Zedek Medical Center

It depends on the strength of the indication for DAPT and the cause of SAH. It is important to keep things in perspective: the absolute risk reduction from DAPT for secondary stroke prevention in the POINT, CHANCE, and THALES trials was small (on the order of 1-3% absolute risk reduction) for minor ...

Would you recommend genetic polymorphic testing before the initiation of antiplatelet medication in patients with ICAD?

2
4 Answers

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Neurology · Brown University Medical School

This is not a bad idea if a rapid test is available. If the patient has clopidogrel resistance, I would treat it with brilinta.

Does the overall conclusion of the CHANCE-2 trial make ticagrelor + ASA a worthwhile transition given the data showing cumulative hazard of stroke diverged during the first week and was subsequently similar, which suggests the benefit of ticagrelor over clopidogrel is seen predominantly soon after stroke?

4 Answers

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Neurology · URMC Neurology

Given the fact that clopidogrel costs 11 cents a day and ticagrelor costs almost $8/day and the fact that most patients will not be tested for slow CYP2c19 metabolizer (or have the results back in a timely fashion), it seems that the combination of ASA plus clopidogrel is the best option from a publ...

Would you generalize the data from the CHANCE-2 trial to a broader clinic population given that the study was specific to Han Chinese patients?

3 Answers

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Neurology · Harvard Medical School

I would not generalize to a broader population at this time but it is probably relevant in slow metabolizers of any ethnicity.