New: NCI-funded clinical trial search
Mednet Logo

Abstract

There is limited available information on patterns of utilization and efficacy of alternative medicine (AM) for patients with cancer. We identified 281 patients with nonmetastatic breast, prostate, lung, or colorectal cancer who chose AM, administered as sole anticancer treatment among patients who did not receive conventional cancer treatment (CCT), defined as chemotherapy, radiotherapy, surgery, and/or hormone therapy. Independent covariates on multivariable logistic regression associated with increased likelihood of AM use included breast or lung cancer, higher socioeconomic status, Intermountain West or Pacific location, stage II or III disease, and low comorbidity score. Following 2:1 matching (CCT = 560 patients and AM = 280 patients) on Cox proportional hazards regression, AM use was independently associated with greater risk of death compared with CCT overall (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.88 to 3.27) and in subgroups with breast (HR = 5.68, 95% CI = 3.22 to 10.04), lung (HR = 2.17, 95% CI = 1.42 to 3.32), and colorectal cancer (HR = 4.57, 95% CI = 1.66 to 12.61). Although rare, AM utilization for curable cancer without any CCT is associated with greater risk of death.

Related Questions

What is your approach to cancer patients who inquire about alternative or complementary treatments?

7
8 Answers

Mednet Member
Radiation Oncology · Mayo Clinic

It depends a little bit on what specifically they want to use, and if they are truly investigating alternative medicine or complementary medicine. For people seeking full alternative medicine without any conventional treatment, I tell them that a research study showed that people who pursued the alt...

How do you counsel young and educated patients with non-metastatic breast cancer who choose non-proven "natural" treatments over standard therapy?

11
6 Answers

Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Radiation Oncology · Huntsman Cancer Institute - University of Utah Health Care

It is extremely difficult to persuade individuals skeptical of medicine to make evidence-based decisions. Most research related to changing scientific beliefs come from literature related to antivaccination attitudes. Previous research has suggested that provaccine messages about safety (messages co...