The New England journal of medicine 2018-03-22
Venetoclax-Rituximab in Relapsed or Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.
Abstract
Background
Venetoclax inhibits BCL2, an antiapoptotic protein that is pathologically overexpressed and that is central to the survival of chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells. We evaluated the efficacy of venetoclax in combination with rituximab in patients with relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia.
Methods
In this randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned 389 patients to receive venetoclax for up to 2 years (from day 1 of cycle 1) plus rituximab for the first 6 months (venetoclax-rituximab group) or bendamustine plus rituximab for 6 months (bendamustine-rituximab group). The trial design did not include crossover to venetoclax plus rituximab for patients in the bendamustine-rituximab group in whom progression occurred. The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival.
Results
After a median follow-up period of 23.8 months, the rate of investigator-assessed progression-free survival was significantly higher in the venetoclax-rituximab group (32 events of progression or death in 194 patients) than in the bendamustine-rituximab group (114 events in 195 patients); the 2-year rates of progression-free survival were 84.9% and 36.3%, respectively (hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.17; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.11 to 0.25; P<0.001 by the stratified log-rank test). The benefit was maintained across all clinical and biologic subgroups, including the subgroup of patients with chromosome 17p deletion; the 2-year rate of progression-free survival among patients with chromosome 17p deletion was 81.5% in the venetoclax-rituximab group versus 27.8% in the bendamustine-rituximab group (hazard ratio, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.29), and the 2-year rate among those without chromosome 17p deletion was 85.9% versus 41.0% (hazard ratio, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.12 to 0.32). The benefit of venetoclax plus rituximab over bendamustine plus rituximab was confirmed by an independent review committee assessment of progression-free survival and other secondary efficacy end points. The rate of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was higher in the venetoclax-rituximab group than in the bendamustine-rituximab group, but the rates of grade 3 or 4 febrile neutropenia and infections or infestations were lower with venetoclax than with bendamustine. The rate of grade 3 or 4 tumor lysis syndrome in the venetoclax-rituximab group was 3.1% (6 of 194 patients).
Conclusions
Among patients with relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia, venetoclax plus rituximab resulted in significantly higher rates of progression-free survival than bendamustine plus rituximab. (Funded by Genentech and AbbVie; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02005471 .).
Related Questions
In a patient who has been receiving 1L Ibrutinib for TP53+ CLL for years with complete hematologic response but detectable MRD, is there any role to switch to the novel BTKi agents given better PFS?
There are a couple of features to this question that need comment. First, the goal of therapy with a single-agent BTKi, regardless of ibrutinib, acalabrutinib, zanubrutinib, or pirtobrutinib, is NOT to achieve undetectable MRD. Very few patients will achieve this milestone due to the drug's MOA. BTK...
If using the triplet AMPLIFY regimen with ven/acala/obin upfront, what do you then plan to use in 2nd line treatment of CLL?
For patients who achieve a favorable response that lasts >1 year (or so, this is a ballpark estimate that may shift with more data), I would be very comfortable re-treating with a covalent BTKi (preferably after screening for BTK resistance mutations by NGS where available - with note of caution tha...
How does pirtobrutinib compare to other available therapies for relapsed/refractory CLL after BTK inhibitor treatment, particularly in terms of efficacy and tolerability?
BRUIN trial enrolled patients with a median of 3 prior lines of treatment. The response rate with pirtobrutinib is close to 80%. However, overall PFS is about 1.5-2 years. So, most patients will eventually relapse after pirtobrutinib.It is possible that the use of pirtobrutinib in earlier lines of t...
What would be your choice of therapy in a fit patient with relapsed CLL previously treated with bendamustine and rituximab who does not want BTK inhibitor therapy?
I am assuming that this individual who has relapsed was receiving initial therapy with bendamustine rituximab is a young, under 65 years of age, CLL patient who does not prefer to have a BTK inhibitor. This is not an uncommon situation given the increasing knowledge of the chronic low-grade toxiciti...