New: NCI-funded clinical trial search
Mednet Logo

What are your top 5 reasons to choose between a TAVI valve Edwards SAPIEN 3 (Edwards Lifesciences) vs an Evolut FX (Medtronic) and what favors one over the other?

Community PollStarted

Which factors primarily influence your choice between the Edwards SAPIEN 3 and the Medtronic Evolut FX TAVI valves?

9 physicians have voted

Join Mednetto vote and see how they answered.

1 Answer
Mednet Member
Cardiology
Answered on
  • Considering the SMART trial, for patients with a small annulus I favor Medtronic. However, evaluating other studies comparing hemodynamics and EOA, I favor Medtronic for most patients (FAVORS MEDTRONIC).
  • If patients have lower coronaries, especially with the history of coronary artery disease, previously I would have considered Edwards but the Evolut FX+ with its coronary windows have helped reduced the need for this (FAVORS MEDTRONIC).
  • The presence of LVOT calcium increases the risk of annular rupture with a balloon-expandable valve and therefore I steer away from the Edwards. (FAVORS MEDTRONIC)
  • Any limitations in iliofemoral access where upsizing sheath would not be possible, the eSheath provides an advantage.

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer