Mednet Logo

What are your top takeaways from ASTRO 2022?

What were your “top 3” presentations/studies coming out of the meeting this year and how will it impact your own clinical practice?
8 Answers
Mednet Member
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Radiation Oncology · Varian Medical Systems/Allegheny health network
Answered on

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Radiation Oncology · Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh
Answered on

1. RTOG 1005 - In a large phase 3 trial, demonstrated the safety and efficacy of simultaneous integrated boost in the management of early stage practice. The question that emerges is who to offer this approach to.

2. Long-Term Outcomes of SABR to Primary Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Multicenter Analysis ...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Radiation Oncology · University of Nebraska Medical Center
Answered on

1. NRG/RTOG 1112: It is a phase III study of sorafenib vs. SBRT followed by sorafenib in locally advanced HCC. This study showed the addition of SBRT improved overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), Time to progression (TTP) without increased toxicity in this patient population. This...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Radiation Oncology · Ohio State University James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute
Answered on

1. NRG/RTOG-1112: Randomized Phase III Study of Sorafenib vs. Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Followed by Sorafenib in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. The results of this long-awaited trial led by Dr. @Dr. First Last showed the benefit of adding SBRT to sorafenib in patients with locally advanced hepa...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Radiation Oncology · Yale School of Medicine
Answered on
1. LUSTRE (presented by Dr. @Dr. First Last) - randomized trial of SBRT (48 Gy in 4 fractions for peripheral versus 60 Gy in 8 fractions from central) vs. hypofractionated RT (60 Gy in 15 fractions) for stage I NSCLC. Local control at 3 years was numerically higher for SBRT (88% vs. 81%), though thi...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Radiation Oncology · Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Answered on

There were many interesting things presented at ASTRO this year. I have chosen the most important abstract for our near-term practice in treating breast cancer patients and two others that are quite novel but which will need much more study before considering whether to adopt them.

1. Abstract 1: Vi...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Radiation Oncology · University of Michigan
Answered on

The issue of using IMPT vs. IMRT in HNC is contentious, with retrospective data suggesting likely similar tumor control but conflicting data regarding the potential clinical superiority of IMPT in reducing acute and late sequellae. While some publications suggest DVH-based superiority of IMPT regard...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Radiation Oncology · Stroger Hospital
Answered on

Good presentations

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer