Mednet Logo

What is the interpretation of two IGRAs with negative mitogen wells, in the absence of immunosuppression?

A patient on meloxicam for LBP developed high, persistent fevers and no other symptoms. An IGRA, among many tests, was sent. The IGRA’s mitogen well was negative (the TB and nil wells were negative as well). 8 days later, the IGRA was repeated, and again, all wells, including the mitogen well, were negative. Does the fact that her PBMC, when exposed to a mitogen, on two separate tests done 8 days apart by a large, commercial lab means that: The lab mishandled her PBMC twice. Something is wrong with her cellular immune system. Other. A patient, who was epidemiologically at risk for prior TB infection, had an IGRA prior to receiving immunosuppressive chemotherapy. The nil and mitogen wells did not produce significant amounts of IFN-γ, but her TB wells did. The lab interpreted this test as indeterminate. A follow-up test was not sent. How should this result be interpreted? Of relevance, at this time, the patient was receiving chemo, had markedly elevated WBC and fever of unknown origin. TB therapy should be started empirically. This result is not evidence of prior TB infection. Despite recent chemo, the IGRA should be repeated. Need more information. Other.
3 Answers
Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Infectious Disease · Cooperman Barnabas Medical Center
Answered on

If I understand this case correctly, the patient is actively ill and the patient's doctors are considering tuberculosis as a possible etiology of the patient's illness. In that scenario, IGRAs and PPDs have a limited to no role. Epidemiology, family history, and other possible exposures do. In your ...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Infectious Disease · University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry
Answered on

In both scenarios, you have an indeterminate test result. Even without immunosuppression a small fraction of people have indeterminate results, and in active TB that percentage is larger.

In scenario 1, if you are concerned about active TB based on exposure or epidemiology, you should pursue testing...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Infectious Disease · University of Louisville Health Sciences Center
Answered on

An IGRA mitogen well serves as a positive control. The nil well detects what I call interfering immunologic activity. It is supposed to be greater than or equal to 8.0 IU/mL to be considered valid. The value (assuming it is less than or equal to 8) is subtracted from the TB well before the TB value ...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer