What is your approach to utilizing MRD-guided therapy in previously untreated CLL, particularly in choosing between continuous versus time-limited treatment?
What is your current practice regarding the incorporation of MRD status in the management of newly diagnosed CLL?
Join Mednetto vote and see how they answered.
The question of what to do relative to a patient receiving therapy for CLL in first line and being MRD negative in blood/bone marrow with a reliable test (NGS sequencing or high sensitivity flow cytometry) and also no enlarged lymph nodes on CT/exam greater than 1.5 cm is challenging. For ibrutinib ...
Join for free or sign in to see the full answer
MRD-guided therapies, including zanubrutinib with venetoclax per SEQUOIA Arm D and ibrutinib with venetoclax (per FLAIR), are highly effective, and SEQUOIA Arm D included patients with TP53-aberrant disease (unlike the AMPLIFY trial of fixed-duration acalabrutinib with venetoclax). The disadvantages...
Join for free or sign in to see the full answer
From my standpoint, FLAIR has not changed how I utilize MRD. I predominantly use a highly sensitive flow cytometry approach at the end of therapy for patients not on a clinical trial. I do value the use of highly sensitive flow testing that can now get us close to 1 x 10 4 or even 10 5 leukemic cell...
Join for free or sign in to see the full answer