New: NCI-funded clinical trial search
Mednet Logo

What is your preferred mode of vascular access for testicular cancer regimens?

Does your institution prefer use of temporary placement each cycle of a PICC line for 5 days outpatient or long-dwell IV? Do your patients require services at home to maintain the line? Some thought port-a-cath should be avoided for risk of thrombosis.
Community PollStarted

What is your preferred mode of vascular access for testicular cancer regimens?

49 physicians have voted

Join Mednetto vote and see how they answered.

2 Answers
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Medical Oncology · Indiana University Simon Cancer Center
Answered on

Actually, we try to avoid all vascular access devices, especially PORT, which causes a 10-20% risk for clot as well as infection. These are young healthy patients usually with excellent veins. Over 90% of our large patient populations with testis cancer simply get their 5 days of chemo with a restart for the IV daily.

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Medical Oncology · Testicular Cancer Commons
Answered on

See our recent editorial "Once Upon a Time" published in J Clinical Oncology Practice. We go through the scant data available comparing peripheral versus central access for first-line therapy of germ cell tumors. I can say with a fair amount of confidence in these young healthy men, that pretty much all high-volume centers utilize peripheral IVs only reserving central devices for only when it is absolutely necessary.

As someone who was at the forefront in the late 1980s of moving BEP from in-hospital to the outpatient setting, we had to adapt our strategies with existing technologies and skills. The standard became peripheral IVs placed by experienced oncology nurses who had pride and experience in starting and maintaining peripheral IVs. Fo...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer