Mednet Logo

What screening tools or signs do you use to predict if a cancer patient is near end-of-life?

There is conflicting data on whether the "surprise question" performs adequately enough. Do you use this or other screening tools alone, or in combination with other data such as albumin/pre-albumin, cancer cachexia, muscle wasting, etc?
8 Answers
Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Medical Oncology · St Louis Cancer Care LLP
Answered on

For most of us, long-time practicing oncologists, all we have to do to determine that one of our patients is at the end of their life is to be in the same room with them.

No special computer programs or calculators are needed. Just look closely at the patient's current weight, their level of conscio...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Medical Oncology · The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center
Answered on

When I see patients with incurable cancers, I usually ask at the first visit, whether they have a living will and what it says. Very few people seem to have filled one. I give them the state form to fill, but that form is very vague. I do recommend no resuscitation if the heart stops beating, as the...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Medical Oncology · University of Wisconsin
Answered on · Updated on

If, by near end-of-life, we mean we would like to predict if a patient has hours to days to live, then I think the most valuable signs to look for include a decreased response to verbal stimuli, decreased response to visual stimuli, nonreactive pupils, an inability to close eyelids, hyperextension o...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Medical Oncology · Stanford University Medical Center
Answered on

It is very true that the "surprise" question does not adequately perform in identifying people who may be nearing the end of life. There are no other standardized screening tools that I use however. Therefore, the "surprise question" is the most frequently used because it makes clinicians at least t...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Medical Oncology · LSU Health Sciences Center New Orleans
Answered on

I suppose there isn't a good and satisfactory universal rule for a "near-end-of-life" predictive biomarker. Again, by the time of truly near-end-of-life care, care with the heart can be more important than caring with science, although both are essential. Depends on how one defines "end-of-life" and...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Hospital Medicine · UT Health San Antonio
Answered on

I wanted to add to the discourse regarding this question from a non-cancer specialist, since I truly believe this is something that we should all do better at. Data show that while roughly 70% of Americans prefer to die at home, only about 30% do. My personal lens: I am an academic hospitalist pract...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Radiation Oncology · University of Western Ontario Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry
Answered on

We know physicians are overly optimistic about survival prediction, and we are 'surprised' when death occurs. Several predictive models have been developed that can help improve accuracy. (Chow et al., PMID 11527298). Many of these require easily accessible data, including albumin and performance st...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Radiation Oncology · Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/Harvard Medical School
Answered on

It is often true that seeing and examining a patient helps the practitioner get a sense of life expectancy. However, as physicians, we need evidence-based tools to support our general gestalt. A plethora of cancer-specific models to help the clinician has been published. This is one area where (drea...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer