Mednet Logo

Do PORTEC-3 and GOG-258 change your approach to managing patients with high-risk or node positive endometrial cancer?

3 Answers
Mednet Member
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Radiation Oncology · University of Kentucky
Answered on

The ambiguous answer is "yes and no." The positive impact of RT on vaginal and nodal failure rates cannot be ignored and argues for a continued role for RT, probably external RT.

There are a number of caveats relative to the interpretations of GOG 258. These include (but may not be limited to) high...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Radiation Oncology · Varian Medical Systems/Allegheny health network
Answered on · Updated on

Based on PORTEC 3, there is a limited benefit of chemo in high risk stage I and II disease (similar to GOG 249) and an improvement in outcome for stage III endometrioid disease (randomization was chemo RT vs. RT). GOG 258 for advanced stage shows a significant decrease in locoregional recurrence (28...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Radiation Oncology · Harold C Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center/UT Southwestern
Answered on

We should await final publication of GOG 258, but the results unfortunately will be interpreted as a negative study for combined chemo+RT. This despite the significant locoregional benefit of radiation of 15%

It should be noted that while the study is described as having Stage III endometrial cancer(...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer