New: NCI-funded clinical trial search
Mednet Logo

Would you consider adjuvant capecitabine for a patient with triple-negative metaplastic carcinoma who has microinvasive residual disease (ypT1miN0) following neoadjuvant therapy?

Does the metaplastic histology influence your decision-making?
Community PollStarted

Do you off adjuvant capecitabine to patients with triple-negative metaplastic breast cancer with ypT1miN0 following neoadjuvant therapy?

54 physicians have voted

Join Mednetto vote and see how they answered.

2 Answers
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Medical Oncology · Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah
Answered on

For a patient with triple-negative metaplastic breast cancer and microinvasive residual disease (ypT1miN0)following neoadjuvant therapy, the decision to use adjuvant capecitabine is nuanced and not definitively addressed in current guidelines or trials.

  1. General TNBC with Residual Disease:
    • Multiple studies, including real-world data from MD Anderson, Dana-Farber, and OSU, show that adjuvant capecitabine improves recurrence-free survival (RFS), distant RFS, and overall survival (OS) in patients with residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
    • The CREATE-X trial (not specific to metaplastic histology) demonstrated benefit in TNBC patients with residual invasive disease, but excluded patients with ypT1mi.
  2. Microinvasive Disease (ypT1mi...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Medical Oncology · Baylor College of Medicine
Answered on

Short answer: yes. Although we have data from CREATE-X, data from GEICAM were negative. Data from FinXX and SYSUCC001, however, were positive. TNBC still carries a high risk of recurrence even with small-volume residual disease. Retrospective and prospective data suggest that chemotherapy is particularly important in the metaplastic subtype, and as it prognosticates poor outcome, it likely means higher absolute benefit.

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer