Mednet Logo

Would you consider adjuvant nivolumab to be the standard of care in stage II/III esophageal/GE junction cancer after completion of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery?

Based on CheckMate 577? Is DFS endpoint sufficient to establish SOC or is OS benefit needed?
Community PollStarted

Should adjuvant nivolumab be the standard of care for resected stage II/III esophageal/GE junction cancer?

86 physicians have voted

Join Mednetto vote and see how they answered.

4 Answers
Mednet Member
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Medical Oncology · Mary Lanning Healthcare Morrison Cancer Center/University of Nebraska Medical Center Adjunct Faculty
Answered on

Patients with gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma who achieve a pCR following preoperative therapy still have a significant risk of recurrence and cancer-specific death following resection. Although recurrence at 5 years can be significantly lower for pCR vs non-pCR patients (27% and 51%), the probability...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Medical Oncology · Baylor Scott & White Health
Answered on

Yes, in May 2021, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved nivolumab for patients with completely resected esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer with residual pathologic disease who have received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. The European Medicines Agency (EMA) also approved adjuvan...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Medical Oncology · University of Washington Medical Center
Answered on

Yes, I would consider nivolumab the new SOC in esophageal/GEJ cancer after trimodality therapy in patients with residual disease in the path specimen (i.e. those without a complete path CR). The DFS benefit with nivolumab was substantial in these patients, and this is the first large randomized stud...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Medical Oncology · Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Answered on

Yes, I would consider this the standard-of-care. And, clearly, I'm not some unconventional rebel here since adjuvant nivolumab in this context is FDA approved and also endorsed by the NCCN!

The premise of the question is an important one though: is a DFS benefit only, while OS data are maturing, suf...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer