Mednet Logo

Would you consider empiric anticoagulation in patients with an acute stroke for whom you have high suspicion for cardioembolic source, but have not yet confirmed LV thrombus, atrial fibrillation, etc.?

Community PollStarted

Would you consider empiric anticoagulation in patients with an acute stroke prior to confirmation of cardioembolic source?

83 physicians have voted

Join Mednetto vote and see how they answered.

3 Answers
Mednet Member
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Neurology · HCA Houston Healthcare
Answered on

In practice, I would rarely consider empiric anticoagulation after an acute ischemic stroke without a confirmed cardioembolic source. I would not consider this approach for suspected LV thrombus, as transthoracic echocardiography is routinely available in the inpatient setting and can quickly confir...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Hospital Medicine · Northwestern Memorial Hospital
Answered on

This needs to be approached with caution. If the stroke is large, there is a risk of bleeding. The general recommendations are to wait until this risk can be understood through imaging. Guidelines warn about starting AC urgently. However, in certain high-risk conditions (like known thrombus), it is ...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Neurology · Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Answered on

I agree with Dr. @Dr. First Last. I would rarely initiate anticoagulation without an embolic source on the first stroke. I would initiate a very thorough work-up, including TTE and likely TEE, cardiac monitoring, hypercoagulable state tests, etc. I have anticoagulated in the setting of a recurrent s...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer