New: NCI-funded clinical trial search
Mednet Logo

Would you consider treating hypercalcemia with CRRT and regional citrate anticoagulation for a dialysis dependent patient who does not respond to bisphosphonate therapy and low calcium dialysate bath?

Community PollStarted

Would you consider using CRRT with regional citrate anticoagulation to treat hypercalcemia in a dialysis-dependent patient who does not respond to bisphosphonate therapy and a low-calcium dialysate bath?

47 physicians have voted

Join Mednetto vote and see how they answered.

2 Answers
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Nephrology · University of California, Los Angeles
Answered on

Although CRRT with citrate anticoagulation may be effective in treating significant hypercalcemia, this is only a temporary solution if the underlying etiology of hypercalcemia persists. The underlying cause of hypercalcemia should be addressed, if possible. If the underlying etiology cannot be easily treated, then denosumab may be a good option. Since denosumab may significantly lower serum calcium level in dialysis patients, denosumab may be a good therapeutic option in this patient with refra...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Nephrology · Ohio State University Medical Center
Answered on

In a dialysis dependent patient, I would not use the RRT to control calcium as its effect is transient. Patients should still be treated according to the pathophysiology of hypercalcemia. If bisphosphonate or denosumab therapy is ineffective at controlling calcium, then I would consider if there is another mechanism to hypercalcemia (i.e. 1,25 OH vitamin d mediated hypercalcemia) which may benefit to steroids. Another consideration is the shifts of calcium with hemodialysis may also be a problem...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer