Mednet Logo

Would you extrapolate results from ELEVATE-RR study to favor use of acalabrutinib as first-line therapy in treatment-naive CLL?

Does this data change your preferred first line treatment regimens when considering other options such as mAb combos, cytotoxic chemotherapy?
Community PollStarted

What is your preferred approach in treatment naive CLL (w/o del(17p)/TP53)?

108 physicians have voted

Join Mednetto vote and see how they answered.

3 Answers
Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Medical Oncology · Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Answered on

The ELEVATE-RR study enrolled patients with a median of 2 prior regimens, with either deletion 11q or deletion 17p. I think one could debate whether selecting this patient population as compared to a less selected treatment naïve population would be more likely to find a difference between the two d...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Medical Oncology · Ohio State University
Answered on

Yes, I feel comfortable extrapolating these data to the frontline setting. This is primarily because we have multiple studies of acalabrutinib as well as ibrutinib in the frontline setting where the PFS estimates at various timepoints are similar.

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Medical Oncology · UPMC Hillman Cancer Center
Answered on

While the study did not compare untreated CLL patients, ELEVATE-RR showed higher cardiovascular events that over the long-term could negatively influence outcome even more than in the up-front rather than the relapse setting where drug exposure is shorter. As such, as both a monotherapy and combinat...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer