Would you give immunotherapy after neoadjuvant gem-cis for bladder cancer if cystectomy is being postponed for months due to non-autoimmune/unrelated comorbidities?
Delay in cystectomy regardless of the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy is associated with compromised survival outcomes (Chu et al., PMID 30840335) and if a patient receives neoadjuvant chemotherapy and is unable to undergo cystectomy for months due to comorbidities, there is no clear data to support the use of immunotherapy as a bridge to surgery. For such a patient, trimodality therapy would be a reasonable alternative to radical cystectomy with data suggesting comparable outcomes to cystectomy in appropriately selected patients (Zlotta et al., PMID 37187202).
Join for free or sign in to see the full answer
If I’m understanding the question correctly, a patient is not having cystectomy due to comorbidity. I think more information would be helpful, but in general, radical cystectomy is not the only option for these patients. It’s important to remember that TMT is a category 1 NCCN recommendation for MIBC, and this does not need to be biased towards the elderly and frail. A recent high-quality meta-analysis showed that bladder preservation with TMT is at least non-inferior to surgery. Of course, a randomized study would be preferred but this was cut short in the past due to poor accrual. There is no evidence to give IO as a bridge to RC. SWOG 1806 had fully accrued but has not been read out, but this will answer the question of IO (atezolizumab)...
Join for free or sign in to see the full answer