Mednet Logo
HomePrimary CareQuestion

Would you initiate anti-arrhythmic drug therapy in patients who are asymptomatic and have normal LV function but with a PVC burden > 20 percent?

4
3 Answers
Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Cardiology · The Cleveland Clinic Foundation

I overall agree with Dr. @Dr. First Last's approach. There are important considerations with high-burden PVCs beyond LVEF. The morphology can be helpful with regard is this consistent or atypical appearance of idiopathic PVCs. I will typically do an assessment for underlying structural heart disease...

Register or Sign In to see full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Cardiology · Baylor College of Medicine/ Texas Children's Hospital

In my younger days I've managed high-burden PVCs with minimal to no symptoms with a spectrum of strategies, including ablation (I've had a case of LVS PVC/VT ablation with late resolution akin to Candemir et al., PMID 30822513), BB, flecainide (case of resolved PVCs after medication holiday), and ob...

Register or Sign In to see full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Cardiology · Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University

I think these patients are better suited for ablation, to prevent VPC-induced LV dysfunction, which may occur at this level of burden. If they do not consider an invasive procedure, I would not treat, since they are asymptomatic and the risk of AAD is not worth the benefits. I would monitor their LV...

Register or Sign In to see full answer