New: NCI-funded clinical trial search
Mednet Logo

Would you recommend avoiding PICC line placement in a kidney transplant patient with an estimated GFR of more than 45 ml/min/1.73m2 and no functional AV access?

Community PollStarted

Would you recommend avoiding PICC line placement in a kidney transplant patient with an estimated GFR of more than 45 ml/min/1.73m2 and no functional AV access?

35 physicians have voted

Join Mednetto vote and see how they answered.

2 Answers
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Nephrology · University of Cincinnati
Answered on

Great question and of course there is no data to guide decision-making in this scenario. Anecdotally, I would assess the patient as a whole, not just limited to current GFR though that is a great starting point. What is their age and co-morbidities - is this a younger /middle-aged/older patient, is their PRA status such that a second transplant is likely, do they have other diagnoses that may hasten renal compromise, etc?

Ideally, anyone who may have a prolonged duration of dialysis in their future should have peripheral superficial veins saved and have a tunneled central line placed instead of a PICC. However, should a PICC be preferable for various reasons, it would be preferential to place the smallest lumen necessary into the dominant a...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Nephrology · Volusia Flagler Vascular Center
Answered on

A good option, if a PICC line is necessary, is the placement of a tunneled internal jugular vein PICC line.

By using the IJ vein, you can preserve peripheral veins for any future AV access placement.

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer