Mednet Logo

After prior BTKi + venetoclax and subsequent progression, how do you then choose next line therapy for high risk CLL?

Would you retreat with venetoclax vs change to alternate covalent or non-covalent BTKi vs cellular therapy?
Community PollStarted

After CLL progression on prior BTKi + venetoclax, what is your usual next-line approach?

85 physicians have voted

Join Mednetto vote and see how they answered.

3 Answers
Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Medical Oncology · MD Anderson Cancer Center Hospital
Answered on

In a patient having clinical progression after a fixed-duration BTKi + venetoclax, I first rule out Richter transformation and check for the acquisition of TP53 aberration and/or resistance mutations. Although the latter is rare in fixed-duration targeted therapies, it is important to rule it out. T...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Medical Oncology · University of Kansas Cancer Center
Answered on

If the patient received time-limited BTKi + BCL-2 and was in remission at the time of discontinuation, then frequently we consider re-treatment as either BTK monotherapy, BCL-2 + anti-CD20, or BTK + BCL-2. Many of these patients will remain sensitive to both agents. You did not ask about how long th...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Hematology · Rutgers Cancer Institute/Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School
Answered on

The first question to ask goes back to patient preference: does the patient want to pursue fixed duration or continuous treatment? If they want another line of fixed-duration treatment, I think retreating with a venetoclax-based regimen is effective based on the available data we have. We know from ...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer