Mednet Logo

In routine clinical practice, how do you operationally define ‘progression despite therapy’ in PPF to justify escalation to combination treatment?

What minimum duration and magnitude of change (FVC, symptoms, HRCT) do you consider an adequate trial before stepping up?
Community PollStarted

Which sign of progression is most likely to drive you to escalate therapy in a patient with autoimmune ILD who is already on baseline immunosuppression?

70 physicians have voted

Join Mednetto vote and see how they answered.

3 Answers
Mednet Member
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Rheumatology · University of Washington
Answered on

ILD patients undergo regular monitoring with intervals based on concern for progression. In addition to symptom review, objective testing includes PFTs with spirometry and DLCO, 6-minute walk testing that provides information on distance walked, symptoms experienced, and whether or not the patient d...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Pulmonology · National Jewish Health
Answered on

This is really difficult. There's a balance between overreacting and waiting until you've lost significant lung function. The other thing to consider is that, at least in our practice, we will have a patient visit where they get testing such as physiology and chest imaging, and then we start a medic...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Pulmonology · Thomas Jefferson University
Answered on

I think this is an interesting question because the possibility of combining antifibrotic therapies now makes “progression despite therapy” relevant in a way it was not before, but we still do not have an evidence-defined threshold for escalation.

If progression is real after looking at the trajector...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer