Are you de-escalating treatment for favorable risk Stage I-II DLBCL patients to 4 cycles of R- CHOP with 2 additional rituximab cycles?
In general I could see this being an option in select patients (not localized stage II or patients who have a contraindication to XRT) but for the most part these patients in my practice are not treated with 6 cycles of R-CHOP. I treat most patients with Stage I and localized stage II with 3 cycles ...
Join for free or sign in to see the full answer
I find the data from FLYER quite compelling, and for appropriately selected patients see this regimen as a standard of care in early stage DLBCL, reducing both short and long term toxicity from radiotherapy without compromising outcomes.
Join for free or sign in to see the full answer
It depends completely on the response to 4 cycles of R-CHOP and its tolerance. I would certainly consider this as an option.Thx, RAB
Join for free or sign in to see the full answer
I find Dr. Matasar's answer totally compelling since it is based on randomized data. The value of post-chemotherapy radiation, even in bulky residual disease, is questionable. However, most of these patients are in CR.
Furthermore, I do not think radiation to any localized regions is without consequ...
Join for free or sign in to see the full answer