Does a low serofast RPR titer (such as 1:1 or 1:2) in the setting of a remote history of appropriately treated latent syphilis in a patient with now uveitis of yet unknown etiology referred from ophthalmology for possible ocular syphilis make a diagnosis of ocular syphilis less likely?

Would you treat for ocular syphilis in a patient referred by ophthalmology with an RPR titer of 1:1 or 1:2 and a remote history of appropriately treated latent syphilis, who now presents with uveitis of unknown etiology?

• Yes, I would offer empiric treatment based on the possibility of syphilitic uveitis despite the low titer
• No, I would not treat as the low titer makes ocular syphilis less likely
• Other