For an adult patient with newly diagnosed IBD with no co-morbidities who requires first step-up to biologics or other “advanced therapy,” would you routinely start with an anti-TNF (+/-antimetabolite), or--if insurance let you do anything you wanted—would you rather start with something else?
Community PollStarted
If insurance placed no restrictions on your choice of therapy for patient with newly diagnosed IBD, which would you start first?
26 physicians have voted
Join Mednetto vote and see how they answered.
2 Answers
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Gastroenterology · Mayo Clinic
Answered on
Recall that the first biologic you start will be the most effective. Because of the safety profile, I would start a selective anti-interleukin-23. The advantage of Tremfya is an all-subcutaneous Q induction, but Skyrizi would be fine as well.
Join for free or sign in to see the full answer
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Gastroenterology · Northwestern Medicine
Answered on
It is too broad of a question, period. Need details and a shared decision with patient as options include steroids with azathioprine, TNFs with azathioprine. IL-23 or ustekinumab.
Join for free or sign in to see the full answer