Mednet Logo
CommunityNeurology

For patients with acute ischemic stroke and BP >185/110, at what point do you consider persistently elevated BP too refractory to safely give thrombolysis?

Current guidelines (AHA, ESO, etc.) are not clear. In addition, if a patient arrives with BP>240 how do you balance the risk of hypoperfusion with excessively rapid lowering?
4 Answers
Mednet Member
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Neurology · University of Calgary
Answered on

Elevated BP is only very rarely truly refractory. I have never encountered a situation where I could not lower the BP in a timely fashion. So, directly, if the patient is appropriate for intravenous thrombolysis, I generally treat BP (give IV medications) in one IV and give thrombolysis in the other...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Neurology · Memorial Hermann
Answered on

I agree with Dr. @Dr. First Last. There is nothing "magic" about the 185/100 level for treating with thrombolytics. I would make these points.

  1. In general, use your common sense. If the BP is very high and uncontrolled, don't treat until you have a good IV, have started the nicardipine drip, and see...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Neurology · University of Colorado, Climate & Health Dept
Answered on

I use 180/105 as my goal since this is the post-administration BP guideline. If they don't respond to one shot of labetalol 20mg IV, I go straight to a drip like Cardene with cleviprex or esmolol reserved as backups if Cardene doesn't work or isn't available. I make sure they're below 180/105 for at...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Neurology · Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Answered on

I would not administer thrombolytics until the BP is consistently below 185 mm Hg systolic and 110 mm Hg diastolic.

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer