New: NCI-funded clinical trial search
Mednet Logo

How do you contour and dose definitive CRT target volumes for an unresectable NSCLC invading vertebral bodies?

Do you cover the entire involved vertebral body with an elective dose volume (similar to spine mets)? How do you balance cord tolerances with coverage?
2 Answers
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Radiation Oncology · Cleveland Clinic
Answered on

This is both an excellent and a complicated question.

While I do not typically favor elective nodal radiation in NSCLC, I do think this is a case where some degree of elective coverage is warranted.

Different imaging modalities yield very different contours when it comes to bone invasion in NSCLC, and while I have not clearly come across data to document this, it is my experience that invasion on CT appears < invasion on PET which appears < invasion on MRI. Thus, for patients with vertebral body invasion, I would always obtain and fuse a high quality MRI with planning CT.

I would use IMRT with a single plan to 60 Gy in 30 fx, and attempt to take the gross disease to 60 Gy (tumor on CT + PET + MRI, plus appropriate small uniform expansion f...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Radiation Oncology · Thomas Jefferson University Hospital
Answered on

While I agree with @Dr. First Last' thoughtful approach (in particular, always using spinal MRI to define the degree of invasion), I would allow a maximum spinal cord dose to reach 54 Gy in view of the potential devastating impact of any local failure, such as cord compression. In my mind, this is a situation similar to the Pancoast tumor, where I also advocate for maximizing local tumor control as the primary goal.

Regarding elective spine RT rather than only targeting the MRI-defined target, I agree again that there is likely no harm in bringing this elective volume to 45 Gy and hopefully addressing microscopic disease.

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer