In a patient who underwent cryoablation for early NSCLC, is there a role for giving preemptive further local therapy?
E.g. would you consider cryo inadequate upfront therapy and recommend SBRT? Or would you do surveillance and only intervene in case of local progression?
2 Answers
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Radiation Oncology · Mayo Clinic
Answered on · Updated on
Hi @Dr. First Last. It's a good question and speaks to some of the ambiguity in the space we work. The interventional physicians are giving a therapy they present as being equivalent to other established options (like surgery or SBRT) but it doesn't have the same depth of research and history. It de...
Join for free or sign in to see the full answer
Mednet Member
Radiation Oncology · Marshfield Clinic - Rice Lake
Answered on · Updated on
I wouldn't treat them until they recur. If there's morbidity, it's because you treated them. If there's no recurrence, it's because the cryo worked. It makes more sense to wait until progression and treat at that time when you have a solid justification for treating the patient.
Join for free or sign in to see the full answer