Mednet Logo
HomeRadiation OncologyQuestion

In patients with EGFR mutant L858R stage III NSCLC who are unresectable due to multistation N2 disease, would you consider upfront osimertinib over definitive intent CCRT?

7
4 Answers
Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Medical Oncology · University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center

This is a very complex question that is common among our thoracic tumor board discussions. I'll answer the latter question first. In this case, I would not offer consolidative durvalumab.

There are data that immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have minimal to no benefit in the metastatic setting base...

Register or Sign In to see full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Radiation Oncology · Yale School of Medicine

While we await LAURA results, I wanted to point out this recent multi-institutional retrospective analysis by Nassar et al., PMID 38278303. This analysis of 136 concurrent chemo-RT patients with stage III NSCLC suggests longer PFS in those receiving consolidative osimertinib compared to durvalumab o...

Register or Sign In to see full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Radiation Oncology · University of Pennsylvania Health System

I thoroughly enjoyed the above discussion points! One more obvious, but important point that I will add is that all patients eventually progress while on EGFR TKIs. These are not curative therapies. Patients who have EGFR-mutated Stages I-III, and even the oligometastatic Stage IV NSCLC, are potenti...

Register or Sign In to see full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Radiation Oncology · Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center

There have been multiple answers in regards to the role of consolidative osimeritinib as per above which, I think some shared decision-making and feasibility of approval is not unreasonable as above until we have LAURA results.

In regards to the first question about considering induction osimeritinib...

Register or Sign In to see full answer