New: NCI-funded clinical trial search
Mednet Logo

In transplant-eligible, fit patients with primary refractory myeloma, what is the optimal timing for stem cell collection?

We know the longer we expose patients to lenalidomide, the harder collection will be. Would you collect now or switch to an alternative regimen to achieve VGPR or response prior to collection? Any preference on KPd versus DPd or alternative regimen?
3 Answers
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Medical Oncology · Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University
Answered on

In fit patients with less than a partial response to induction therapy, i.e. primary refractory, the optimal timing for stem cell collection is NEVER. If they don't respond to three drug induction (proteasome inhibitor + IMiD + steroid), they are unlikely to respond durably to a standard high dose melphalan transplant.

There is not great literature on this -- these patients are approximately 2-3% of the newly diagnosed clinical trial population per IFM-2009 (Attal et al, NEJM, 2017) or 6-8% of those that have been induced in the community and then go on to a transplant trial (BMT CTN 0702, Stadtmauer, JCO, 2019).

The older PETHEMA data on how these patients do with autologous transplant of primary refractory myeloma is too rosy as the patien...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Medical Oncology · University of Chicago
Answered on

I will take a different tactic in these primary refractory disease cases.

I typically employ a VD-PACE like regimen and give for 2 cycles. Then use the second cycle as part of chemomobilization for stem cell collection, followed by high dose melphalan and stem cell rescue. After transplant, I then will use triplet therapy with drugs not yet utilized (i.e. Dara/Kd being my preference if used VRd upfront). The duration of remission probably won't be as durable as others, but meaningful enough that it works and can be utilized.

CAR T-therapy is not an option off protocol for primary refractory disease at this time, but this could be a viable option in the future.

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Medical Oncology · University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Answered on

Adding an updated response as requested by theMednet editorial team :) I agree with everything in @Dr. First Last's response from 3 years ago. For patients with primary refractory myeloma, even collecting stem cells is probably low-yield especially since it's not benign. And while continued len exposure might make collection harder down the line, trying to mobilize stem cells in someone with a high bone marrow PC burden might be just as hard.

The big update since this original answer in 2019, of course, is the advent of standard-of-care CAR T and other advanced immune-based therapies: belantamab now, teclistamab soon, etc. While most of these wouldn't yet be commercially available as second-line therapies, this is under investigation: e.g.,...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer