Mednet Logo

Abstract

Background

Adjuvant radiotherapy reduces the risk of biochemical progression in prostate cancer patients after radical prostatectomy. We aimed to compare adjuvant versus early salvage radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy, combined with short-term hormonal therapy, in terms of oncological outcomes and tolerance.

Methods

GETUG-AFU 17 was a randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial done at 46 French hospitals. Men aged at least 18 years who had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 1 or less, localised adenocarcinoma of the prostate treated with radical prostatectomy, who had pathologically-staged pT3a, pT3b, or pT4a (with bladder neck invasion), pNx (without pelvic lymph nodes dissection), or pN0 (with negative lymph nodes dissection) disease, and who had positive surgical margins were eligible for inclusion in the study. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to either immediate adjuvant radiotherapy or delayed salvage radiotherapy at the time of biochemical relapse. Random assignment, by minimisation, was done using web-based software and stratified by Gleason score, pT stage, and centre. All patients received 6 months of triptorelin (intramuscular injection every 3 months). The primary endpoint was event-free survival. Efficacy and safety analyses were done on the intention-to-treat population. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00667069.

Findings

Between March 7, 2008, and June 23, 2016, 424 patients were enrolled. We planned to enrol 718 patients, with 359 in each study group. However, on May 20, 2016, the independent data monitoring committee recommended early termination of enrolment because of unexpectedly low event rates. At database lock on Dec 19, 2019, the overall median follow-up time from random assignment was 75 months (IQR 50-100), 74 months (47-100) in the adjuvant radiotherapy group and 78 months (52-101) in the salvage radiotherapy group. In the salvage radiotherapy group, 115 (54%) of 212 patients initiated study treatment after biochemical relapse. 205 (97%) of 212 patients started treatment in the adjuvant group. 5-year event-free survival was 92% (95% CI 86-95) in the adjuvant radiotherapy group and 90% (85-94) in the salvage radiotherapy group (HR 0·81, 95% CI 0·48-1·36; log-rank p=0·42). Acute grade 3 or worse toxic effects occurred in six (3%) of 212 patients in the adjuvant radiotherapy group and in four (2%) of 212 patients in the salvage radiotherapy group. Late grade 2 or worse genitourinary toxicities were reported in 125 (59%) of 212 patients in the adjuvant radiotherapy group and 46 (22%) of 212 patients in the salvage radiotherapy group. Late genitourinary adverse events of grade 2 or worse were reported in 58 (27%) of 212 patients in the adjuvant radiotherapy group versus 14 (7%) of 212 patients in the salvage radiotherapy group (p<0·0001). Late erectile dysfunction was grade 2 or worse in 60 (28%) of 212 in the adjuvant radiotherapy group and 17 (8%) of 212 in the salvage radiotherapy group (p<0·0001).

Interpretation

Although our analysis lacked statistical power, we found no benefit for event-free survival in patients assigned to adjuvant radiotherapy compared with patients assigned to salvage radiotherapy. Adjuvant radiotherapy increased the risk of genitourinary toxicity and erectile dysfunction. A policy of early salvage radiotherapy could spare men from overtreatment with radiotherapy and the associated adverse events.

Funding

French Health Ministry and Ipsen.

Related Questions

What is your radiotherapy fractionation recommendation for favorable intermediate risk prostate cancer who has ~70 cc prostate?

4
7 Answers

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Radiation Oncology · Michigan Healthcare Professionals, PC

This may seem controversial in 2026 and seems to contradict evidence, but I just wanted to relay what I've seen. I was a fairly early adopter of moderate hypo-fractionation, not the first, but not the last - probably around 2012-2013. I pretty much changed to that for all patients for around 11-12 y...

Is there any evidence for combining surgery and XRT +/- ADT for treatment of localized high risk prostate cancer?

2
1 Answers

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Radiation Oncology

Presumably, this is a question inquiring about planned post-operative RT. If so, surgery followed by adjuvant, post-operative radiation therapy (PORT) has been profiled extensively in several RCTs: EORTC 22911, SWOG 8794, ARO 96-02, FinnProstataX. The two more recent trials, ARO 96-02 and FinnProsta...

Would you irradiate the elective pelvis of a patient with high risk prostate cancer in the setting of osteoporosis and sacral insufficiency fractures?

4 Answers

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Radiation Oncology · Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center

Yes, I would irradiate the pelvis in a patient with high risk prostate cancer for whom elective pelvic nodal irradiation is indicated, even in the setting of osteoporosis and prior sacral insufficiency fractures. The bigger risk to bone health in these patients is the need for ADT, rather than pelvi...

What is your PSA threshold for obtaining PSMA PET for biochemical failure after RP?

5
2 Answers

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Radiation Oncology · Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine

I typically order a PSMA PET after ~0.20. Sometimes lower if there are multiple aggressive features or poor prognostic factors (i.e. SVI with no lymph node dissection and persistently positive PSA of 0.15 after RP). This approach seems to be a reasonable threshold to me based on two considerations: ...

Would you consider radical prostatectomy for a young male with unfavorable intermediate risk cT3a prostate cancer and PSMA PET concerning for regional lymph nodes involvement but negative conventional imaging?

2
3 Answers

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Radiation Oncology

I would approach this scenario by considering two main issues. The first issue is what the probability of the patient truly having pN+ disease based on cN+ findings on advanced imaging. There have recently been two trials published from the Netherlands, PEPPER (using 68¸Ga-PSMA-11) and SALT (using 1...

What is your criteria for undetectable PSA value after prostatectomy?

1
2 Answers

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Radiation Oncology · Varian Medical Systems/Allegheny health network

In the era of ultra-sensitive PSA, reading below threshold of .2 ng/ml also reflects biochemical recurrence especially in the right context. That being said, if values are low like above, we generally repeat PSA to see the trend rather than act on treatment on single value.

Do you consider tertiary grade pattern, LVI or PNI on prostatectomy specimens as adverse features to recommend EBRT and ADT for patients with unfavorable intermediate prostate CA after prostatectomy with undetectable PSA?

3
1 Answers

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Radiation Oncology

No, I don’t think there is any current available evidence to define a benefit for ADT in the post-operative setting for patients with an undetectable PSA. The two major trials which define a benefit for ADT in this setting, RTOG 9601 and GETUG AFU-16 had a lower limit of a PSA of 0.2 at treatment in...