The New England journal of medicine 2018-06-14
Atezolizumab for First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Nonsquamous NSCLC.
Abstract
Background
The cancer-cell-killing property of atezolizumab may be enhanced by the blockade of vascular endothelial growth factor-mediated immunosuppression with bevacizumab. This open-label, phase 3 study evaluated atezolizumab plus bevacizumab plus chemotherapy in patients with metastatic nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who had not previously received chemotherapy.
Methods
We randomly assigned patients to receive atezolizumab plus carboplatin plus paclitaxel (ACP), bevacizumab plus carboplatin plus paclitaxel (BCP), or atezolizumab plus BCP (ABCP) every 3 weeks for four or six cycles, followed by maintenance therapy with atezolizumab, bevacizumab, or both. The two primary end points were investigator-assessed progression-free survival both among patients in the intention-to-treat population who had a wild-type genotype (WT population; patients with EGFR or ALK genetic alterations were excluded) and among patients in the WT population who had high expression of an effector T-cell (Teff) gene signature in the tumor (Teff-high WT population) and overall survival in the WT population. The ABCP group was compared with the BCP group before the ACP group was compared with the BCP group.
Results
In the WT population, 356 patients were assigned to the ABCP group, and 336 to the BCP group. The median progression-free survival was longer in the ABCP group than in the BCP group (8.3 months vs. 6.8 months; hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.52 to 0.74; P<0.001); the corresponding values in the Teff-high WT population were 11.3 months and 6.8 months (hazard ratio, 0.51 [95% CI, 0.38 to 0.68]; P<0.001). Progression-free survival was also longer in the ABCP group than in the BCP group in the entire intention-to-treat population (including those with EGFR or ALK genetic alterations) and among patients with low or negative programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, those with low Teff gene-signature expression, and those with liver metastases. Median overall survival among the patients in the WT population was longer in the ABCP group than in the BCP group (19.2 months vs. 14.7 months; hazard ratio for death, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.64 to 0.96; P=0.02). The safety profile of ABCP was consistent with previously reported safety risks of the individual medicines.
Conclusions
The addition of atezolizumab to bevacizumab plus chemotherapy significantly improved progression-free survival and overall survival among patients with metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC, regardless of PD-L1 expression and EGFR or ALK genetic alteration status. (Funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche/Genentech; IMpower150 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02366143 .).
Related Questions
How would you approach post-chemoradiation consolidation in a patient with stage III lung adenocarcinoma with an EGFR exon 18 G719A mutation and highly positive PD-L1 level?
Based on currently available FDA-approved therapies, osimertinib is a suitable choice. While G719A is an atypical EGFR TK mutation and some studies show that this variant may be less sensitive to osimertinib compared to the other classic mutations, the same retrospective studies also show clinical e...
When and how would you consider utilizing checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy in EGFR mutated metastatic lung cancer?
I typically reserve checkpoint inhibitors as a last resort treatment option in patients with EGFR mutant non-small cell lung cancer. I have used the IMpower150 regimen on several occasions, though we now have multiple datasets confirming the generally minimal benefit from immunotherapy for patients ...
How do you approach patients with driver mutation positive, Stage IV NSCLC who don't benefit from upfront first-line TKI?
It depends on the mutation. EGFR mutants after Osimertinib:- If oligometastatic disease: an option is radiation to the oligometastatic spots and continue osimertinib. It is important to re-biopsy as well due to the possibility of small cell transformation. If transformed to small cell, in general, c...
Can immunotherapy, alone or with chemo, be considered for ROS1+ NSCLC after exhausting ROS1 targeted therapy options?
Following evidence in more common driving mutations (especially those not associated with a history of tobacco use), I would not recommend immunotherapy alone for this group. When using chemotherapy, it is reasonable to consider adding immunotherapy, but there is no strong evidence to support it.
How do you decide between checkpoint monotherapy versus chemo-immunotherapy approach for patients with PD-L1 High (>50%) NSCLC?
At this point, there are no prospective trials comparing checkpoint monotherapy and chemo-immunotherapy for patients with PD-L1 high NSCLC. The ongoing prospective INSIGNA trial will answer this question. If one does a cross trial comparison of pembrolizumab for patients with PD-L1 of >50% and chemo...
How do you counsel patients on the risk of thromboembolic complications with use of immunotherapy in NSCLC?
Patients with metastatic lung cancer are at increased risk of thromboembolic events with an estimated frequency of 13.9% (Connolly et al., PMID 23026639). Preclinical data show that PD-1/PD-1 pathway blockade may lead to increased levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines and T cell driven progression an...
Are you selecting any specific patient cohort with metastatic NSCLC for treatment with the CheckMate 9LA protocol of ipilimumab + nivolumab + 2 cycles of chemotherapy?
When looking at potential subgroups that might benefit from the CheckMate 9LA regimen, I consider patients with squamous cell carcinoma, where the HR was 0.63; PD-L1 less than 1%, which demonstrated similar 2y OS to those with PD-L1> 1%. Another intriguing group is patients with brain metastases whe...
For patients with EGFR mutation positive NSCLC who progress on first line TKI without actionable resistance mechanisms, would you consider chemotherapy + targeted therapy as a second line option, or chemotherapy +/- immunotherapy?
This is certainly not an easy question. Assuming that the patient doesn't have an actionable targetable mutation, two important things that may be helpful to know in such cases are disease behavior and the status of disease in the brain. If the disease is behaving aggressively, we SHOULD ALWAYS rule...
How do the results of CheckMate 9LA and subsequent FDA approval of nivo+ipi+chemo impact your first line management of patients with non-small cell lung cancer?
As many have pointed out, the control arm is no longer SOC and this just adds to numerous ‘me too‘ regimens in frontline non driver mutation NSCLC- atezolizumab, nivo/ipi alone to name a few. It will not greatly impact current practice. If this leads to a price war and brings down the cost of drugs,...
How would you approach frontline treatment of a patient with metastatic non-squamous NSCLC with ERBB2 amplification and PD-L1 > 50%?
This interesting case brings up how to separate in our work fact from fiction. We are presented with a case of a patient with metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer with a PD-L1 TPS score of 55% and ERBB2 amplification by Foundation One testing.What is the right approach? Standard chemo/...
For metastatic large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of lung, would you treat as small cell with platinum/etoposide/atezolizumab or would you treat as NSCLC and use platinum doublet/pembrolizumab?
Can consider NGS and treat like SCLC if there is Rb/p53 mutation pattern and NSCLC if STK11/KEAP1 pattern (later prob Immunotherapy resistant?) https://www.esmo.org/Conferences/Past-Conferences/ESMO-2017-Congress/News-Articles/Improved-Survival-Demonstrated-with-NSCLC-chemotherapy-in-Pulmonary-Lar...
How do you choose between atezolizumab, bevacizumab, carboplatin, paclitaxel (IMpower 150) vs. pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy (KEYNOTE 189) in patients with metastatic NSCLC?
This is a great question. As we are all well aware, the combination of chemotherapy and immunotherapy has become a standard of care for some patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC. Both the IMPOWER trial published by Socinski et al. in NEJM and the KEYNOTE 189 trial published by Gandhi et al. in ...
Would you re-challenge patients with an EGFR TKI beyond progression if repeated biopsies show redemostration of a sensitizing mutation (exon 19 deletion) and no other resistance mechanisms?
In a patient who has progressed after initial TKI based therapy and who lack a specific resistance mechanism (for example, a T790M in patients treated with first line TKI), my typical "next line" is chemotherapy (+/- immunotherapy - the IMPower 150 study showed the same hazard ratio for patients wit...
What would you choose as the second line treatment option for a stage IV EGFR mutant lung adenocarcinoma that has progressed on osimertinib?
The best choice for 2nd line treatment after progression on osimertinib depends on multiple factors. If a patient has progressive disease in only 1 area while all other areas are well controlled, you could consider local therapy (SBRT or EBRT) to that one area of progression, and continue the osimer...
What is the preferred second line, systemic therapy for NSCLC patients following first line chemoimmunotherapy?
This is as usual a quite complex question, and for a sophisticated audience such as theMednet readers, I always want to provide a nuanced answer; so here is what my preferred second line systemic therapy currently is:None.None.Still none…Indeed, now that chemo/immunotherapy has become the de facto s...
How would you treat a patient with metastatic NSCLC >50% PDL-1 positive AND an EGFR or ALK gene mutation/rearrangement in the first-line setting?
There have been multiple reports showing a positive association between EGFR activation (through mutational activation and/or signaling) and PDL1 expression (e.g. J Thorac Oncol 2015 Jun;10(6):910-23). Similarly, there are some reports of a similar association with ALK translocation (e.g. Clin Cance...