Lancet (London, England) 2017-01-21
Atezolizumab versus docetaxel in patients with previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (OAK): a phase 3, open-label, multicentre randomised controlled trial.
Abstract
Background
Atezolizumab is a humanised antiprogrammed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) monoclonal antibody that inhibits PD-L1 and programmed death-1 (PD-1) and PD-L1 and B7-1 interactions, reinvigorating anticancer immunity. We assessed its efficacy and safety versus docetaxel in previously treated patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.
Methods
We did a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial (OAK) in 194 academic or community oncology centres in 31 countries. We enrolled patients who had squamous or non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer, were 18 years or older, had measurable disease per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. Patients had received one to two previous cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens (one or more platinum based combination therapies) for stage IIIB or IV non-small-cell lung cancer. Patients with a history of autoimmune disease and those who had received previous treatments with docetaxel, CD137 agonists, anti-CTLA4, or therapies targeting the PD-L1 and PD-1 pathway were excluded. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to intravenously receive either atezolizumab 1200 mg or docetaxel 75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks by permuted block randomisation (block size of eight) via an interactive voice or web response system. Coprimary endpoints were overall survival in the intention-to-treat (ITT) and PD-L1-expression population TC1/2/3 or IC1/2/3 (≥1% PD-L1 on tumour cells or tumour-infiltrating immune cells). The primary efficacy analysis was done in the first 850 of 1225 enrolled patients. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02008227.
Findings
Between March 11, 2014, and April 29, 2015, 1225 patients were recruited. In the primary population, 425 patients were randomly assigned to receive atezolizumab and 425 patients were assigned to receive docetaxel. Overall survival was significantly longer with atezolizumab in the ITT and PD-L1-expression populations. In the ITT population, overall survival was improved with atezolizumab compared with docetaxel (median overall survival was 13·8 months [95% CI 11·8-15·7] vs 9·6 months [8·6-11·2]; hazard ratio [HR] 0·73 [95% CI 0·62-0·87], p=0·0003). Overall survival in the TC1/2/3 or IC1/2/3 population was improved with atezolizumab (n=241) compared with docetaxel (n=222; median overall survival was 15·7 months [95% CI 12·6-18·0] with atezolizumab vs 10·3 months [8·8-12·0] with docetaxel; HR 0·74 [95% CI 0·58-0·93]; p=0·0102). Patients in the PD-L1 low or undetectable subgroup (TC0 and IC0) also had improved survival with atezolizumab (median overall survival 12·6 months vs 8·9 months; HR 0·75 [95% CI 0·59-0·96]). Overall survival improvement was similar in patients with squamous (HR 0·73 [95% CI 0·54-0·98]; n=112 in the atezolizumab group and n=110 in the docetaxel group) or non-squamous (0·73 [0·60-0·89]; n=313 and n=315) histology. Fewer patients had treatment-related grade 3 or 4 adverse events with atezolizumab (90 [15%] of 609 patients) versus docetaxel (247 [43%] of 578 patients). One treatment-related death from a respiratory tract infection was reported in the docetaxel group.
Interpretation
To our knowledge, OAK is the first randomised phase 3 study to report results of a PD-L1-targeted therapy, with atezolizumab treatment resulting in a clinically relevant improvement of overall survival versus docetaxel in previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer, regardless of PD-L1 expression or histology, with a favourable safety profile.
Funding
F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Genentech, Inc.
Related Questions
Would you consider using IO alone for lung cancer patients with PD-L1 <1% but who have high TMB?
The brief answer here is a resounding no. A more extended version might include a statement that this would be a case of not seeing the forest for the trees.And the tree here is the FDA approval of pembrolizumab in a tissue-agnostic fashion for patients with advanced TMB >10 mutations/Mbase- likely ...
For a patient with metastatic NSCLC, PD-L1>50%, after progression on first line checkpoint inhibitor, do you prefer chemotherapy alone or chemotherapy added to the immunotherapy?
In general, I would say that chemotherapy alone would be the recommendation with the caveat that if disease progression can be treated ablative, then I continue pembrolizumab (I've had only 1 or 2 patients who fall into this category). I base this impact on a number of case reports as well as a smal...
Would you offer immunotherapy after chemoradiotherapy for Stage III lung cancer given results of PACIFIC Trial?
In light of the comments by Professor Vansteenkinste comparing the ESMO 2017 plenary session incorporating the PACIFIC study results as a “tsunami” in the footsteps of last year’s ESMO lung cancer “earthquake” presentations, an appropriate title to this question might be- should we let the” floodgat...
How would you treat a patient with metastatic NSCLC >50% PDL-1 positive AND an EGFR or ALK gene mutation/rearrangement in the first-line setting?
There have been multiple reports showing a positive association between EGFR activation (through mutational activation and/or signaling) and PDL1 expression (e.g. J Thorac Oncol 2015 Jun;10(6):910-23). Similarly, there are some reports of a similar association with ALK translocation (e.g. Clin Cance...