Mednet Logo

Abstract

Background

The use of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer may be guided by clinicopathological factors and a score based on a 21-gene assay to determine the risk of recurrence. Whether the level of clinical risk of breast cancer recurrence adds prognostic information to the recurrence score is not known.

Methods

We performed a prospective trial involving 9427 women with hormone-receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative, axillary node-negative breast cancer, in whom an assay of 21 genes had been performed, and we classified the clinical risk of recurrence of breast cancer as low or high on the basis of the tumor size and histologic grade. The effect of clinical risk was evaluated by calculating hazard ratios for distant recurrence with the use of Cox proportional-hazards models. The initial endocrine therapy was tamoxifen alone in the majority of the premenopausal women who were 50 years of age or younger.

Results

The level of clinical risk was prognostic of distant recurrence in women with an intermediate 21-gene recurrence score of 11 to 25 (on a scale of 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a worse prognosis or a greater potential benefit from chemotherapy) who were randomly assigned to endocrine therapy (hazard ratio for the comparison of high vs. low clinical risk, 2.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.93 to 3.87) or to chemotherapy plus endocrine (chemoendocrine) therapy (hazard ratio, 2.41; 95% CI, 1.66 to 3.48) and in women with a high recurrence score (a score of 26 to 100), all of whom were assigned to chemoendocrine therapy (hazard ratio, 3.17; 95% CI, 1.94 to 5.19). Among women who were 50 years of age or younger who had received endocrine therapy alone, the estimated (±SE) rate of distant recurrence at 9 years was less than 5% (≤1.8±0.9%) with a low recurrence score (a score of 0 to 10), irrespective of clinical risk, and 4.7±1.0% with an intermediate recurrence score and low clinical risk. In this age group, the estimated distant recurrence at 9 years exceeded 10% among women with a high clinical risk and an intermediate recurrence score who received endocrine therapy alone (12.3±2.4%) and among those with a high recurrence score who received chemoendocrine therapy (15.2±3.3%).

Conclusions

Clinical-risk stratification provided prognostic information that, when added to the 21-gene recurrence score, could be used to identify premenopausal women who could benefit from more effective therapy. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00310180.).

Related Questions

How do you approach ovarian function suppression in premenopausal women with HR+/HER2-, node negative breast cancer and intermediate OncoType dx scores (11-25) who received chemotherapy?

3
1 Answers

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Medical Oncology · Emory University Winship Cancer Institute Midtown

The SOFT/TEXT data showed that the patients who benefited from ovarian suppression + endocrine therapy were those who were <35 years old or those who had prior chemotherapy (essentially those patients who were deemed to have high risk disease). The TAILORx study demonstrated that patients with recur...

Would you give chemotherapy to a post menopausal woman with ER/PR positive HER2 negative breast cancer, T2N1 with 3+ lymph nodes, Ki-67 30% and OncoType RS of 10?

5
4 Answers

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Medical Oncology · Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

I would not give this postmenopausal woman adjuvant with a recurrence score of 10 based on RxPONDER trial. In that trial women with recurrence scores of 25 or less were randomized to receive chemotherapy + endocrine versus endocrine therapy alone. The Kaplan Meier curves were superimposable. I would...

Would a low or intermediate OncoType RS affect your choice of adjuvant endocrine therapy for a premenopausal woman with high clinical risk HR+ early stage disease?

3 Answers

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Medical Oncology · Private Practice and Digital Health

From TEXT and SOFT trials, patients who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy did well and had similar outcome across treatment arms, with tamoxifen performing as well as the arms with ovarian suppression. This is an interesting observation that reflects lower risk disease, that does not need chemot...

Which patients age < 50 with OncoType score < 11 do you offer ovarian suppression?

2
1 Answers

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Medical Oncology · H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida

For T1-2N0 very low risk disease the TAILORx data demonstrated a less than 5% risk of distant recurrence regardless of clinical risk. (Sparano et al NEJM 2019) The majority of premenopausal were given tamoxifen alone. The absolute difference between tamoxifen and OFS/AI in such a low risk group woul...

How would you approach a stage 1 HR+/HER2- pre-menopausal patient <50 years old with Oncotype DX RS of 24?

8
4 Answers

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Medical Oncology · H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida

All the prior comments are very reasonable. It is hard to completely exclude a small absolute benefit from chemotherapy in this group. The trial's subset analyses aren't designed to definitively answer whether ovarian suppression or direct action of the chemo led to the observed risk reduction in &lt;5...