The New England journal of medicine 2019-05-30
Daratumumab plus Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone for Untreated Myeloma.
Abstract
Background
Lenalidomide plus dexamethasone is a standard treatment for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who are ineligible for autologous stem-cell transplantation. We sought to determine whether the addition of daratumumab would significantly reduce the risk of disease progression or death in this population.
Methods
We randomly assigned 737 patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who were ineligible for autologous stem-cell transplantation to receive daratumumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (daratumumab group) or lenalidomide and dexamethasone alone (control group). Treatment was to continue until the occurrence of disease progression or unacceptable side effects. The primary end point was progression-free survival.
Results
At a median follow-up of 28.0 months, disease progression or death had occurred in 240 patients (97 of 368 patients [26.4%] in the daratumumab group and 143 of 369 patients [38.8%] in the control group). The estimated percentage of patients who were alive without disease progression at 30 months was 70.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 65.0 to 75.4) in the daratumumab group and 55.6% (95% CI, 49.5 to 61.3) in the control group (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.73; P<0.001). The percentage of patients with a complete response or better was 47.6% in the daratumumab group and 24.9% in the control group (P<0.001). A total of 24.2% of the patients in the daratumumab group, as compared with 7.3% of the patients in the control group, had results below the threshold for minimal residual disease (1 tumor cell per 105 white cells) (P<0.001). The most common adverse events of grade 3 or 4 were neutropenia (50.0% in the daratumumab group vs. 35.3% in the control group), anemia (11.8% vs. 19.7%), lymphopenia (15.1% vs. 10.7%), and pneumonia (13.7% vs. 7.9%).
Conclusions
Among patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who were ineligible for autologous stem-cell transplantation, the risk of disease progression or death was significantly lower among those who received daratumumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone than among those who received lenalidomide and dexamethasone alone. A higher incidence of neutropenia and pneumonia was observed in the daratumumab group. (Funded by Janssen Research and Development; MAIA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02252172.).
Related Questions
Do you continue daratumumab beyond 24 months in first line treatment of amyloidosis?
This is an important and common clinical question, and one for which prospective data are currently limited. For background, the ANDROMEDA clinical trial (Kastritis et al., PMID 34192431) demonstrated that the addition of daratumumab to cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (CyBorD) signif...
When, if ever, would you select a three-drug regimen instead of four-drug regimen in patients with newly diagnosed Multiple Myeloma?
Thank you for this question. For older, transplant-ineligible patients, there is no data that patients live longer or better (the true goals of treatment) with four drugs instead of three drugs. Yes, the responses are better, and we hope this may translate to longevity over time, but we do not know ...
How does one approach maintenance treatment in transplant ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma?
IMROZ and BENEFIT trials are interesting in that they are billed as for transplant-ineligible patients, yet frail patients were excluded, so I don't think they give us the answer for how to maintain a frail patient. The best answer for a frail patient is, I believe, the MAIA trial, which gives DRD t...
Do you recommend utilizing daratumumab in the maintenance phase after a quadruplet induction for transplant eligible multiple myeloma?
Great question as always - both the Phase 2 GRIFFIN study (Dara-VRd vs VRd using IV Dara and 21-day induction cycles) and the Phase 3 PERSEUS study (Dara-VRd vs VRd using subQ dara and 28-day induction cycles) went on to use dara + lenalidomide for all patients in the post-transplant maintenance set...
What post-auto maintenance therapy do you recommend for patients with high-risk multiple myeloma?
This is tough. You want each particular risk group to correspond to a maintenance treatment that is likely to benefit the patient - not too much nor too little. The definition of high risk has changed from one single characteristic or one cytogenetic abnormality to a more additive model such as the ...
How do you now approach treatment sequencing in MM in light of the DETERMINATION trial data?
There are two questions that come to mind re: DETERMINATION with respect to sequencing.1) To do early transplant or not?2) To do indefinite lenalidomide maintenance? My views on question #1 are evolving, but here is how I have unpacked it and stated elsewhere on theMednet. REASONS TO DO TRANSPLANT: ...
What would be your approach to initial treatment of a patient with standard-risk myeloma unwilling to undergo autologous stem cell transplant, if practicing in a resource-limited setting?
For non-transplant candidates or patients unwilling to have transplant with standard risk MM, these are my 2 choices: RVd: len/velcade/dex: based on the SWOG S077 compared to Rd: Durie et al., PMID 28017406. Dara Rd: Daratumumab/Revlimid/dex: based on the MAIA study compared to Rd: Facon et al., PMI...
How do you determine when to use a maintenance regimen vs continuous 3-drug regimen in a transplant-ineligible MM patient after response to first line therapy?
After completing initial therapy (which may or may not include high dose melphalan and auto SCT), I typically use maintenance lenalidomide. I consider “dual maintenance,” which is combining lenalidomide and a proteasome inhibitor, for patients with high risk FISH: t(4;14), t(14;16), and del17p. 1q g...
What is your preferred first line treatment regimen for patients with untreated transplant-ineligible MM?
For transplant-ineligible patients, there are many excellent choices, including RVD lite and Dara Rd. My practice has shifted to Dara Rd for several reasons: The HR for Dara Rd v. Rd which is 0.56 appears to be better than the HR for RVd v. Rd in SWOG 0777, where it was 0.712 (though it should be no...
How would you decide on VRd vs DRd for initial management of transplant ineligible multiple myeloma?
Both VRd and DRd are reasonable induction regimens for newly diagnosed transplant ineligible patients. DRd has the most direct evidence, as there is a phase III study (MAIA, Facon et al., NEJM, 2019) comparing DRd to Rd with both arms including treatment until progression in a transplant ineligible ...
When would you add daratumumab to a PI/IMiD/dex backbone for first-line treatment of transplant-eligible multiple myeloma?
Short answer - in patients with low risk disease.Long answer - CASSIOPEIA enrolled fit patients below 65 years of age with adequate kidney function (greater than or equal to 40 mL/min/1.73 m2) with predominantly stage 1 & 2 disease by the revised international staging system (91% in Dara-VTd, 90% VT...
When, if ever, would you choose a two-drug regimen instead of three drug regimen first line in patients with transplant-ineligible Myeloma?
Daratumumab is generally well tolerated so would at least consider DaraRd triplet regimen as per the MAIA trial, since there is already FDA approval of this combination for transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed MM patients. Now with SQ Dara also approved and more widely available, this regimen is mo...
Would you consider using daratumumab in the first line setting for non-transplant eligible multiple myeloma?
Agree as above; you cannot fairly compare PFS when the treatment arms have different durations of therapy.One could argue that the current standard for previously untreated elderly myeloma patients is continuous lenalidomide and dexamethasone, as described in the FIRST study, (Benboubker et al, NEJM...