Mednet Logo

Abstract

Context

Patients with periampullary adenocarcinomas undergo the same resectional surgery as that of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Although adjuvant chemotherapy has been shown to have a survival benefit for pancreatic cancer, there have been no randomized trials for periampullary adenocarcinomas.

Objective

To determine whether adjuvant chemotherapy (fluorouracil or gemcitabine) provides improved overall survival following resection.

Design, setting, and patients

The European Study Group for Pancreatic Cancer (ESPAC)-3 periampullary trial, an open-label, phase 3, randomized controlled trial (July 2000-May 2008) in 100 centers in Europe, Australia, Japan, and Canada. Of the 428 patients included in the primary analysis, 297 had ampullary, 96 had bile duct, and 35 had other cancers.

Interventions

One hundred forty-four patients were assigned to the observation group, 143 patients to receive 20 mg/m2 of folinic acid via intravenous bolus injection followed by 425 mg/m2 of fluorouracil via intravenous bolus injection administered 1 to 5 days every 28 days, and 141 patients to receive 1000 mg/m2 of intravenous infusion of gemcitabine once a week for 3 of every 4 weeks for 6 months.

Main outcome measures

The primary outcome measure was overall survival with chemotherapy vs no chemotherapy; secondary measures were chemotherapy type, toxic effects, progression-free survival, and quality of life.

Results

Eighty-eight patients (61%) in the observation group, 83 (58%) in the fluorouracil plus folinic acid group, and 73 (52%) in the gemcitabine group died. In the observation group, the median survival was 35.2 months (95%% CI, 27.2-43.0 months) and was 43.1 (95%, CI, 34.0-56.0) in the 2 chemotherapy groups (hazard ratio, 0.86; (95% CI, 0.66-1.11; χ2 = 1.33; P = .25). After adjusting for independent prognostic variables of age, bile duct cancer, poor tumor differentiation, and positive lymph nodes and after conducting multiple regression analysis, the hazard ratio for chemotherapy compared with observation was 0.75 (95% CI, 0.57-0.98; Wald χ2 = 4.53, P = .03).

Conclusions

Among patients with resected periampullary adenocarcinoma, adjuvant chemotherapy, compared with observation, was not associated with a significant survival benefit in the primary analysis; however, multivariable analysis adjusting for prognostic variables demonstrated a statistically significant survival benefit associated with adjuvant chemotherapy.

Trial registration

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00058201.

Related Questions

What is the role for adjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiation in ampullary carcinoma?

2
1 Answers

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Medical Oncology · University of Wisconsin

Such a challenging question because of a paucity of good data. When I try to decide what to do in this setting, a lot of it depends upon the patient's clinical factors (ability to tolerate therapy, postoperative recovery, margin status, etc). Based on ESPAC-3, I felt pretty comfortable that for most...

When is SBRT or hypofractionated radiation appropriate as adjuvant treatment for pancreatic cancer?

9
3 Answers

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Radiation Oncology · Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

There may be a variety of opinions about this question. 33 Gy in 5 looks to be as least as good as 50.4 Gy in 28 in unresectable pancreatic cancer and has had some improved pathologic responses in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer in experienced hands (Hermann et al., PMID 25538019). However, ...