New: NCI-funded clinical trial search
Mednet Logo

Abstract

Importance

Many patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving immunotherapy show primary resistance. High-dose radiotherapy can lead to increased tumor antigen release, improved antigen presentation, and T-cell infiltration. This radiotherapy may enhance the effects of checkpoint inhibition.

Objective

To assess whether stereotactic body radiotherapy on a single tumor site preceding pembrolizumab treatment enhances tumor response in patients with metastatic NSCLC.

Design, setting, and participants

Multicenter, randomized phase 2 study (PEMBRO-RT) of 92 patients with advanced NSCLC enrolled between July 1, 2015, and March 31, 2018, regardless of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) status. Data analysis was of the intention-to-treat population.

Interventions

Pembrolizumab (200 mg/kg every 3 weeks) either alone (control arm) or after radiotherapy (3 doses of 8 Gy) (experimental arm) to a single tumor site until confirmed radiographic progression, unacceptable toxic effects, investigator decision, patient withdrawal of consent, or a maximum of 24 months.

Main outcomes and measures

Improvement in overall response rate (ORR) at 12 weeks from 20% in the control arm to 50% in the experimental arm with P < .10.

Results

Of the 92 patients enrolled, 76 were randomized to the control arm (n = 40) or the experimental arm (n = 36). Of those, the median age was 62 years (range, 35-78 years), and 44 (58%) were men. The ORR at 12 weeks was 18% in the control arm vs 36% in the experimental arm (P = .07). Median progression-free survival was 1.9 months (95% CI, 1.7-6.9 months) vs 6.6 months (95% CI, 4.0-14.6 months) (hazard ratio, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.42-1.18; P = .19), and median overall survival was 7.6 months (95% CI, 6.0-13.9 months) vs 15.9 months (95% CI, 7.1 months to not reached) (hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.37-1.18; P = .16). Subgroup analyses showed the largest benefit from the addition of radiotherapy in patients with PD-L1-negative tumors. No increase in treatment-related toxic effects was observed in the experimental arm.

Conclusions and relevance

Stereotactic body radiotherapy prior to pembrolizumab was well tolerated. Although a doubling of ORR was observed, the results did not meet the study's prespecified end point criteria for meaningful clinical benefit. Positive results were largely influenced by the PD-L1-negative subgroup, which had significantly improved progression-free survival and overall survival. These results suggest that a larger trial is necessary to determine whether radiotherapy may activate noninflamed NSCLC toward a more inflamed tumor microenvironment.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02492568.

Related Questions

Would you consider SBRT and adjuvant therapy for a 4cm, node-negative, non-oncogene driven, NSCLC not amenable to surgical resection?

1 Answers

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Medical Oncology · The Ohio State University School of Medicine

Ultimately, currently open clinical trials will address this question (i.e., SWOG-S1914, NCT04214262). In the absence of this, there have been several questions here on this topic ranging from the possible role for adjuvant chemotherapy, incorporating ctDNA testing, and how to follow these patients ...

Do you hold immunotherapy when administering lung SBRT?

3
3 Answers

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Radiation Oncology · University of Colorado School of Medicine

Good question, limited data to inform an answer.An ongoing trial ("iSABR") in which we are participating involves giving durvalumab 5 days prior to lung SBRT for early stage NSCLC and then continuing that agent for a total of 5 cycles; data are maturing, so I can't offer an estimate of pneumonitis r...

Do you consider initiating systemic therapy for patients with NSCLC who develop oligometastatic disease and have all known sites of disease treated with SBRT?

1
1 Answers

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Medical Oncology · Albert Einstein College of Medicine at Montefiore Medical Center

This is a very intriguing and challenging question and addresses a not so uncommon clinical scenario when patients present with one or just a few sites of recurrent disease after delivery of what was considered to be definitive therapy. In such contexts many times it appears appealing and appropriat...