The New England journal of medicine 2011-06-23
Exemestane for breast-cancer prevention in postmenopausal women.
Abstract
Background
Tamoxifen and raloxifene have limited patient acceptance for primary prevention of breast cancer. Aromatase inhibitors prevent more contralateral breast cancers and cause fewer side effects than tamoxifen in patients with early-stage breast cancer.
Methods
In a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial of exemestane designed to detect a 65% relative reduction in invasive breast cancer, eligible postmenopausal women 35 years of age or older had at least one of the following risk factors: 60 years of age or older; Gail 5-year risk score greater than 1.66% (chances in 100 of invasive breast cancer developing within 5 years); prior atypical ductal or lobular hyperplasia or lobular carcinoma in situ; or ductal carcinoma in situ with mastectomy. Toxic effects and health-related and menopause-specific qualities of life were measured.
Results
A total of 4560 women for whom the median age was 62.5 years and the median Gail risk score was 2.3% were randomly assigned to either exemestane or placebo. At a median follow-up of 35 months, 11 invasive breast cancers were detected in those given exemestane and in 32 of those given placebo, with a 65% relative reduction in the annual incidence of invasive breast cancer (0.19% vs. 0.55%; hazard ratio, 0.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.18 to 0.70; P=0.002). The annual incidence of invasive plus noninvasive (ductal carcinoma in situ) breast cancers was 0.35% on exemestane and 0.77% on placebo (hazard ratio, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.27 to 0.79; P=0.004). Adverse events occurred in 88% of the exemestane group and 85% of the placebo group (P=0.003), with no significant differences between the two groups in terms of skeletal fractures, cardiovascular events, other cancers, or treatment-related deaths. Minimal quality-of-life differences were observed.
Conclusions
Exemestane significantly reduced invasive breast cancers in postmenopausal women who were at moderately increased risk for breast cancer. During a median follow-up period of 3 years, exemestane was associated with no serious toxic effects and only minimal changes in health-related quality of life. (Funded by Pfizer and others; NCIC CTG MAP.3 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00083174.).
Related Questions
What is your approach to chemoprevention for HR+ DCIS in the ipsilateral breast in a patient who already completed 7 years of an AI for a prior HR+ invasive breast cancer?
This is a not-uncommon scenario. What is the appropriate use of endocrine therapy after ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence or second primary breast cancer in a patient who has recently completed hormonal therapy?As shown in the Breast Cancer Prevention Trial (P-1), MAP.3, and IBIS II, both SERMs an...
Would you prescribe an aromatase inhibitor prophylactically for a post-menopausal woman with a deleterious BRCA2 mutation and a history of DCIS who declines prophylactic mastectomy?
The IBIS II trial (Lancet Onc Forbes et al 2016) established anastrazole was non inferior but not superior in preventing recurrences after DCIS. The MAP3 trial (Goss NEJM) demonstrated efficacy of extemestane vs tamoxifen in the chemoprevention of a first breast cancer in higher risk postmenopausal ...
Do you discontinue anti-hormonal therapy if a high-risk ER+ HER2- localized breast cancer patient develops blood clots on anti-hormonal therapy?
Tamoxifen has been associated with an increased risk for venous thromboembolic events, but there does not appear to be any increased risk with the aromatase inhibitors in the placebo controlled studies. These include MA.17, MA.17R in the extended endocrine therapy setting and MAP.3 and IBISII in the...