Lancet 2021 Jun 05
First-line nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for advanced gastric, gastro-oesophageal junction, and oesophageal adenocarcinoma (CheckMate 649): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial.
Abstract
Background
First-line chemotherapy for advanced or metastatic human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma has a median overall survival (OS) of less than 1 year. We aimed to evaluate first-line programmed cell death (PD)-1 inhibitor-based therapies in gastric, gastro-oesophageal junction, and oesophageal adenocarcinoma. We report the first results for nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone.
Methods
In this multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial (CheckMate 649), we enrolled adults (≥18 years) with previously untreated, unresectable, non-HER2-positive gastric, gastro-oesophageal junction, or oesophageal adenocarcinoma, regardless of PD-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression from 175 hospitals and cancer centres in 29 countries. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1 while all three groups were open) via interactive web response technology (block sizes of six) to nivolumab (360 mg every 3 weeks or 240 mg every 2 weeks) plus chemotherapy (capecitabine and oxaliplatin every 3 weeks or leucovorin, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin every 2 weeks), nivolumab plus ipilimumab, or chemotherapy alone. Primary endpoints for nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone were OS or progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review, in patients whose tumours had a PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) of five or more. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of the assigned treatment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02872116.
Findings
From March 27, 2017, to April 24, 2019, of 2687 patients assessed for eligibility, we concurrently randomly assigned 1581 patients to treatment (nivolumab plus chemotherapy [n=789, 50%] or chemotherapy alone [n=792, 50%]). The median follow-up for OS was 13·1 months (IQR 6·7-19·1) for nivolumab plus chemotherapy and 11·1 months (5·8-16·1) for chemotherapy alone. Nivolumab plus chemotherapy resulted in significant improvements in OS (hazard ratio [HR] 0·71 [98·4% CI 0·59-0·86]; p<0·0001) and PFS (HR 0·68 [98 % CI 0·56-0·81]; p<0·0001) versus chemotherapy alone in patients with a PD-L1 CPS of five or more (minimum follow-up 12·1 months). Additional results showed significant improvement in OS, along with PFS benefit, in patients with a PD-L1 CPS of one or more and all randomly assigned patients. Among all treated patients, 462 (59%) of 782 patients in the nivolumab plus chemotherapy group and 341 (44%) of 767 patients in the chemotherapy alone group had grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events. The most common any-grade treatment-related adverse events (≥25%) were nausea, diarrhoea, and peripheral neuropathy across both groups. 16 (2%) deaths in the nivolumab plus chemotherapy group and four (1%) deaths in the chemotherapy alone group were considered to be treatment-related. No new safety signals were identified.
Interpretation
Nivolumab is the first PD-1 inhibitor to show superior OS, along with PFS benefit and an acceptable safety profile, in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in previously untreated patients with advanced gastric, gastro-oesophageal junction, or oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Nivolumab plus chemotherapy represents a new standard first-line treatment for these patients.
Funding
Bristol Myers Squibb, in collaboration with Ono Pharmaceutical.
Related Questions
For patients with locally advanced GEJ adenocarcinoma with low PDL-1 score, will you still incorporate durvalumab with FLOT therapy?
Yes. I would still incorporate durvalumab with FLOT in patients with locally advanced GEJ adenocarcinoma even when PD-L1 expression is low. MATTERHORN was intentionally designed as an all-comers study without PD-L1 selection, and the event-free survival benefit was observed in the overall population...
Would you add immunotherapy to FOLFOX if the patient is not a FLOT candidate for neoadjuvant gastric cancer, extrapolating data from the MATTERHORN study?
While it is always somewhat perilous to extrapolate from a proper study to lesser situations, this seems quite reasonable. It seems highly unlikely that the removal of Taxotere from a fluoropyrimidine-oxaliplatin-based regimen would render immunotherapy less effective in gastric cancer. In the MATTE...
What are your top takeaways from ASCO GI 2023?
Top 3 radiation oncology studies: Abstract 489- NRG/RTOG 1112 presented at ASTRO but only phase III study to establish the role of liver SBRT in HCC; will SBRT supplant radioembolization given the 3 negative phase III studies for radioembolization in contrast to this positive study for SBRT Abstract...
What is the optimal management of patients with gastroesophageal cancer who progress to metastatic disease during preoperative FLOT?
As we all know, peri-operative FLOT is considered a standard-of-care for locally advanced GEJ/gastric adenocarcinomas (at least the vast majority of tumors that are MMR proficient/MSS). In my experience, actual progression of a carefully staged locally advanced cancer to metastatic disease during pr...
Based on KEYNOTE-811, would you add pembrolizumab for HER2+ distal esophageal adenocarcinoma with new supraclavicular lymph nodes if treated previously with concurrent chemoradiation and PD-L1 CPS of 3?
There are a few important pieces of information needed to make a good therapeutic decision in this case: Age and comorbidities of the patient, performance status. Duration of progression free interval since finishing Chemo-Rads. What kind of imaging is done to assess extent of disease. Having sai...
What are your considerations for choice of immunotherapy agent with patients with metastatic pMMR HER2- esophageal/GEJ/gastric adenocarcinoma with CPS >=10?
I alluded to this earlier. Although both CheckMate 649 and KEYNOTE 590 included esophageal cancer, there were caveats. Specifically, in CheckMate 649, there were relatively few patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma. The positive results of CM-649 were clearly driven by gastric adenocarcinoma, part...
What initial systemic approach will you recommend for metastatic pMMR HER2- esophageal/GEJ/gastric adenocarcinoma with CPS of 0-4?
In such patients, OS does not differ between chemotherapy alone and chemotherapy plus immunotherapy, therefore chemotherapy alone would be an appropriate choice. There is no difference in terms of OS benefit between CPS <1% or CPS 1 to 4%. The benefit that immunotherapy adds to chemotherapy is sligh...
What first line treatment would you consider for a patient with stage IV gastric cancer that is HER2 negative and MSI-high?
For a patient with MSI-H, HER2 negative metastatic gastric cancer, PD1 blockade with pembrolizumab (pembro) would be my first choice. The KEYNOTE-062 data support the efficacy of pembro in this setting [Shitara et al., PMID 32880601].The phase 3 KEYNOTE-062 study randomized patients with untreated, ...