International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics 2011-09-01
Fractionation for whole breast irradiation: an American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) evidence-based guideline.
Abstract
Purpose
In patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast-conserving surgery, randomized trials have found little difference in local control and survival outcomes between patients treated with conventionally fractionated (CF-) whole breast irradiation (WBI) and those receiving hypofractionated (HF)-WBI. However, it remains controversial whether these results apply to all subgroups of patients. We therefore developed an evidence-based guideline to provide direction for clinical practice.
Methods and materials
A task force authorized by the American Society for Radiation Oncology weighed evidence from a systematic literature review and produced the recommendations contained herein.
Results
The majority of patients in randomized trials were aged 50 years or older, had disease Stage pT1-2 pN0, did not receive chemotherapy, and were treated with a radiation dose homogeneity within ±7% in the central axis plane. Such patients experienced equivalent outcomes with either HF-WBI or CF-WBI. Patients not meeting these criteria were relatively underrepresented, and few of the trials reported subgroup analyses. For patients not receiving a radiation boost, the task force favored a dose schedule of 42.5 Gy in 16 fractions when HF-WBI is planned. The task force also recommended that the heart should be excluded from the primary treatment fields (when HF-WBI is used) due to lingering uncertainty regarding late effects of HF-WBI on cardiac function. The task force could not agree on the appropriateness of a tumor bed boost in patients treated with HF-WBI.
Conclusion
Data were sufficient to support the use of HF-WBI for patients with early-stage breast cancer who met all the aforementioned criteria. For other patients, the task force could not reach agreement either for or against the use of HF-WBI, which nevertheless should not be interpreted as a contraindication to its use.
Related Questions
What fractionation would you offer to a young pre-menopausal woman with early stage ER+/HER2- breast cancer who received adjuvant chemotherapy and is highly interested in maximizing breast cosmesis?
40 Gy in 15 fractions with focus on dose homogeneity aiming for V105 < 5%.
Is there an age cutoff you use to determine when you will offer standard vs hypofractionated breast radiation in early stage breast cancer?
About 20% of patients in both START A and START B were under the age of 50, and these were huge trials. As such, I don't see a compelling reason not to treat younger women with hypofractionation. To put it another way, I don't think we have good reason to believe that schedules that are designed to ...
Are there situations where you would use hypofractionated radiotherapy for Stage III breast cancer?
The answer to this question is complex, and cannot be adequately explained in a brief response.Treatment of local advanced breast with hypofractionated radiation is not currently an accepted standard practice in this country. This situation occurs in both breast conservation and mastectomy (+/- reco...