Mednet Logo

International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics 2017-10-01

Improved Metastasis- and Disease-Free Survival With Preoperative Sequential Short-Course Radiation Therapy and FOLFOX Chemotherapy for Rectal Cancer Compared With Neoadjuvant Long-Course Chemoradiotherapy: Results of a Matched Pair Analysis.

Abstract

Purpose

To compare treatment and toxicity outcomes between a phase 2 institutional trial of near total neoadjuvant therapy (nTNT) for locally advanced rectal cancer and a similar historical control cohort treated at Washington University in St. Louis with the current US standard of care, defined as neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT), total mesorectal excision (TME), and adjuvant FOLFOX chemotherapy; to expand the comparison to an additional institution, patients treated with similar NCRT at Stanford University were included.

Methods and materials

Sixty-nine patients with cT3-4N0-2M0 rectal adenocarcinoma enrolled on the Washington University in St. Louis phase 2 study of nTNT were included for analysis. Patients treated at the same institution with conventional NCRT and adjuvant FOLFOX were matched for exact cTNM stage. Forty-one patients treated with NCRT at Stanford University were included in a second analysis. Kaplan-Meier analysis with log-rank test was used to compare local control, distant metastasis-free survival, disease-free survival, and overall survival.

Results

Median follow-up was 49 and 54 months for nTNT and NCRT, respectively. Pathologic complete response and T-downstaging rates were 28% versus 16% (P=.21) and 75% versus 41% (P<.001) in the nTNT and NCRT cohorts, respectively. Three-year disease-free survival (85% vs 68%, P=.032) was significantly better in the nTNT group. Actuarial 3-year local control (92% vs 96%, P=.36) and overall survival (96% vs 88%, P=.67) were similar. The Stanford cohort had significantly lower clinical stage. After controlling for clinical stage, age, tumor location, institution, and number of chemotherapy cycles, nTNT treatment remained significantly associated with lower risk of recurrence (P=.006).

Conclusions

Patients treated with nTNT had higher T-downstaging and superior distant metastasis-free survival and disease-free survival compared with conventional NCRT when matched for tumor location and exact cTNM stage. Near total neoadjuvant therapy remained a significant multivariate predictor for improved outcome when including patients treated with NCRT at another institution.

Related Questions

With the RAPIDO trial demonstrating efficacy of short course XRT as part of TNT for locally advanced rectal cancer, is there a role for short course XRT to be integrated into watch and wait programs?

1
2 Answers

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Radiation Oncology · University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

Great question, and one our group has discussed extensively. Our group currently uses short course radiation nearly exclusively in the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer. One notable exception (at least so far) is if the patient desires NOM. Our rationale is that there aren’t as many data f...

What is the preferred palliative regimen for elderly patients with rectal cancer who elect to forego surgery?

4
3 Answers

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Radiation Oncology · Fox Chase Cancer Center

This is a question that comes up somewhat frequently and I don't believe really has a definitive answer. I myself have used multiple regimens in this situation. I think it really depends on the performance status and life expectancy of the particular patient. This is also a topic that may bring out ...