Mednet Logo

Abstract

Background

Whether closure of a patent foramen ovale reduces the risk of recurrence of ischemic stroke in patients who have had a cryptogenic ischemic stroke is unknown.

Methods

In a multicenter, randomized, open-label trial, with blinded adjudication of end-point events, we randomly assigned patients 18 to 60 years of age who had a patent foramen ovale (PFO) and had had a cryptogenic ischemic stroke to undergo closure of the PFO (PFO closure group) or to receive medical therapy alone (aspirin, warfarin, clopidogrel, or aspirin combined with extended-release dipyridamole; medical-therapy group). The primary efficacy end point was a composite of recurrent nonfatal ischemic stroke, fatal ischemic stroke, or early death after randomization. The results of the analysis of the primary outcome from the original trial period have been reported previously; the current analysis of data from the extended follow-up period was considered to be exploratory.

Results

We enrolled 980 patients (mean age, 45.9 years) at 69 sites. Patients were followed for a median of 5.9 years. Treatment exposure in the two groups was unequal (3141 patient-years in the PFO closure group vs. 2669 patient-years in the medical-therapy group), owing to a higher dropout rate in the medical-therapy group. In the intention-to-treat population, recurrent ischemic stroke occurred in 18 patients in the PFO closure group and in 28 patients in the medical-therapy group, resulting in rates of 0.58 events per 100 patient-years and 1.07 events per 100 patient-years, respectively (hazard ratio with PFO closure vs. medical therapy, 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.31 to 0.999; P=0.046 by the log-rank test). Recurrent ischemic stroke of undetermined cause occurred in 10 patients in the PFO closure group and in 23 patients in the medical-therapy group (hazard ratio, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.18 to 0.79; P=0.007). Venous thromboembolism (which comprised events of pulmonary embolism and deep-vein thrombosis) was more common in the PFO closure group than in the medical-therapy group.

Conclusions

Among adults who had had a cryptogenic ischemic stroke, closure of a PFO was associated with a lower rate of recurrent ischemic strokes than medical therapy alone during extended follow-up. (Funded by St. Jude Medical; RESPECT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00465270 .).

Related Questions

When do you use anticoagulation over antiplatelet therapy for secondary stroke prevention in patients with LV injury or dysfunction?

1
1 Answers

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Neurology · University of Calgary

First, I will observe that the recent work is a cohort study, not an RCT< and I would be careful about concluding that anticoagulation is the best approach. We have had prior trials, e.g., WARCEF and the related ESUS trials (NAVIGATE and RESPECT), and others that have looked at possible cardioemboli...

Would you recommend PFO closure in patients >60 years old with presumed paradoxical embolism as their mechanism of stroke?

6
2 Answers

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Neurology · Columbia University

Technically, based on the available clinical trial evidence, PFO closure is not indicated for patients over age 60 or for patients whose stroke was > 6 months ago. However, we frequently need to extrapolate from clinical trial populations to manage the patients we see in practice. Also, presumably, ...