The New England journal of medicine 2022 Feb 03
Nivolumab Combination Therapy in Advanced Esophageal Squamous-Cell Carcinoma.
Abstract
Background
First-line chemotherapy for advanced esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma results in poor outcomes. The monoclonal antibody nivolumab has shown an overall survival benefit over chemotherapy in previously treated patients with advanced esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma.
Methods
In this open-label, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned adults with previously untreated, unresectable advanced, recurrent, or metastatic esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive nivolumab plus chemotherapy, nivolumab plus the monoclonal antibody ipilimumab, or chemotherapy. The primary end points were overall survival and progression-free survival, as determined by blinded independent central review. Hierarchical testing was performed first in patients with tumor-cell programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression of 1% or greater and then in the overall population (all randomly assigned patients).
Results
A total of 970 patients underwent randomization. At a 13-month minimum follow-up, overall survival was significantly longer with nivolumab plus chemotherapy than with chemotherapy alone, both among patients with tumor-cell PD-L1 expression of 1% or greater (median, 15.4 vs. 9.1 months; hazard ratio, 0.54; 99.5% confidence interval [CI], 0.37 to 0.80; P<0.001) and in the overall population (median, 13.2 vs. 10.7 months; hazard ratio, 0.74; 99.1% CI, 0.58 to 0.96; P = 0.002). Overall survival was also significantly longer with nivolumab plus ipilimumab than with chemotherapy among patients with tumor-cell PD-L1 expression of 1% or greater (median, 13.7 vs. 9.1 months; hazard ratio, 0.64; 98.6% CI, 0.46 to 0.90; P = 0.001) and in the overall population (median, 12.7 vs. 10.7 months; hazard ratio, 0.78; 98.2% CI, 0.62 to 0.98; P = 0.01). Among patients with tumor-cell PD-L1 expression of 1% or greater, a significant progression-free survival benefit was also seen with nivolumab plus chemotherapy over chemotherapy alone (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.65; 98.5% CI, 0.46 to 0.92; P = 0.002) but not with nivolumab plus ipilimumab as compared with chemotherapy. The incidence of treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or 4 was 47% with nivolumab plus chemotherapy, 32% with nivolumab plus ipilimumab, and 36% with chemotherapy alone.
Conclusions
Both first-line treatment with nivolumab plus chemotherapy and first-line treatment with nivolumab plus ipilimumab resulted in significantly longer overall survival than chemotherapy alone in patients with advanced esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma, with no new safety signals identified. (Funded by Bristol Myers Squibb and Ono Pharmaceutical; CheckMate 648 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03143153.).
Related Questions
In a patient with a mid-esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with tracheal invasion confirmed on bronchoscopy, would you treat with definitive chemo-radiation with curative intent?
I generally start with chemotherapy alone in these patients, usually carbo/taxol for 2-3 months, and then re-evaluate with PET, bronchoscopy, and endoscopy to determine if there is still evidence of transmural invasion into the trachea. Often, if the tumor responds, the tracheal invasion is no longe...
What is your second line therapy for PDL1 negative metastatic squamous esophageal cancer who did not receive a checkpoint inhibitor in first line setting?
I would not personally consider immunotherapy in any context for such a patient. For the purpose of answering this question, I assume that a "PD-L1 negative" tumor refers to a PD-L1 TPS 0% and CPS 0 tumor.As a quick reminder, the 2 relevant studies in the US for 1st-line immunotherapy in ESCC patien...
In patient with upper esophageal SCC who had partial response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation but deemed not to be a surgical candidate, would you recommend chemotherapy or nivolumab?
Once again, there's no clear answer to these head scratchers. For the purpose of answering this question, I will assume that the patient has a locally persistent tumor s/p definitive chemoradiation and is medically inoperable.In that case, the first issue to consider is whether there is a role for m...