The New England journal of medicine 2018-01-11
Osimertinib in Untreated EGFR-Mutated Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.
Abstract
Background
Osimertinib is an oral, third-generation, irreversible epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) that selectively inhibits both EGFR-TKI-sensitizing and EGFR T790M resistance mutations. We compared osimertinib with standard EGFR-TKIs in patients with previously untreated, EGFR mutation-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Methods
In this double-blind, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned 556 patients with previously untreated, EGFR mutation-positive (exon 19 deletion or L858R) advanced NSCLC in a 1:1 ratio to receive either osimertinib (at a dose of 80 mg once daily) or a standard EGFR-TKI (gefitinib at a dose of 250 mg once daily or erlotinib at a dose of 150 mg once daily). The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival.
Results
The median progression-free survival was significantly longer with osimertinib than with standard EGFR-TKIs (18.9 months vs. 10.2 months; hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.46; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.37 to 0.57; P<0.001). The objective response rate was similar in the two groups: 80% with osimertinib and 76% with standard EGFR-TKIs (odds ratio, 1.27; 95% CI, 0.85 to 1.90; P=0.24). The median duration of response was 17.2 months (95% CI, 13.8 to 22.0) with osimertinib versus 8.5 months (95% CI, 7.3 to 9.8) with standard EGFR-TKIs. Data on overall survival were immature at the interim analysis (25% maturity). The survival rate at 18 months was 83% (95% CI, 78 to 87) with osimertinib and 71% (95% CI, 65 to 76) with standard EGFR-TKIs (hazard ratio for death, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.45 to 0.88; P=0.007 [nonsignificant in the interim analysis]). Adverse events of grade 3 or higher were less frequent with osimertinib than with standard EGFR-TKIs (34% vs. 45%).
Conclusions
Osimertinib showed efficacy superior to that of standard EGFR-TKIs in the first-line treatment of EGFR mutation-positive advanced NSCLC, with a similar safety profile and lower rates of serious adverse events. (Funded by AstraZeneca; FLAURA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02296125 .).
Related Questions
How do you counsel patients with Stage IIIA EGFR+ lung cancer regarding treatment intent with concurrent chemoRT + consolidative systemic therapy?
I think one of the crucial take-home points from the LAURA clinical trial (Lu et al., PMID 38828946) is how often we (the medical oncology community) tell patients we are treating them with "curative intent" but ignore the incredibly high relapse risk among patients with EGFR mutant NSCLC with stage...
Based on new data from ASCO2019, would you consider gefitinib +chemotherapy instead of osimertinib frontline for EGFRm metastatic NSCLC pts?
While gefitinib + chemo did show a similar PFS as frontline osimertinib, the tolerability and safety profile concerns me. Therefore, I do not plan to change my practice and will still use osimertinib as frontline therapy for my patients with EGFR mutated stage IV lung cancer.
Is it acceptable to treat patients with limited, asymptomatic brain metastases and EGFR-mutant NSCLC with upfront TKI?
Though some clinicians have been exploring the idea of targeted therapy for EGFR mutant brain metastases, this has been done in the absence of strong evidence. Reasons for pushing this idea are that sometimes the lesions seem to respond, and this has been seen in some single arm studies and anecdota...