Lancet
Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for first-line treatment of advanced oesophageal cancer (KEYNOTE-590): a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study.
Abstract
Background
First-line therapy for advanced oesophageal cancer is currently limited to fluoropyrimidine plus platinum-based chemotherapy. We aimed to evaluate the antitumour activity of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone as first-line treatment in advanced oesophageal cancer and Siewert type 1 gastro-oesophageal junction cancer.
Methods
We did a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 3 study across 168 medical centres in 26 countries. Patients aged 18 years or older with previously untreated, histologically or cytologically confirmed, locally advanced, unresectable or metastatic oesophageal cancer or Siewert type 1 gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (regardless of PD-L1 status), measurable disease per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1, were randomly assigned (1:1) to intravenous pembrolizumab 200 mg or placebo, plus 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin (chemotherapy), once every 3 weeks for up to 35 cycles. Randomisation was stratified by geographical region, histology, and performance status. Patients, investigators, and site staff were masked to group assignment and PD-L1 biomarker status. Primary endpoints were overall survival in patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma and PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) of 10 or more, and overall survival and progression-free survival in patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma, PD-L1 CPS of 10 or more, and in all randomised patients. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03189719, and is closed to recruitment.
Findings
Between July 25, 2017, and June 3, 2019, 1020 patients were screened and 749 were enrolled and randomly assigned to pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy (n=373 [50%]) or placebo plus chemotherapy (n=376 [50%]). At the first interim analysis (median follow-up of 22·6 months), pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy was superior to placebo plus chemotherapy for overall survival in patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma and PD-L1 CPS of 10 or more (median 13·9 months vs 8·8 months; hazard ratio 0·57 [95% CI 0·43-0·75]; p<0·0001), oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (12·6 months vs 9·8 months; 0·72 [0·60-0·88]; p=0·0006), PD-L1 CPS of 10 or more (13·5 months vs 9·4 months; 0·62 [0·49-0·78]; p<0·0001), and in all randomised patients (12·4 months vs 9·8 months; 0·73 [0·62-0·86]; p<0·0001). Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy was superior to placebo plus chemotherapy for progression-free survival in patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (6·3 months vs 5·8 months; 0·65 [0·54-0·78]; p<0·0001), PD-L1 CPS of 10 or more (7·5 months vs 5·5 months; 0·51 [0·41-0·65]; p<0·0001), and in all randomised patients (6·3 months vs 5·8 months; 0·65 [0·55-0·76]; p<0·0001). Treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or higher occurred in 266 (72%) patients in the pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy group versus 250 (68%) in the placebo plus chemotherapy group.
Interpretation
Compared with placebo plus chemotherapy, pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy improved overall survival in patients with previously untreated, advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma and PD-L1 CPS of 10 or more, and overall survival and progression-free survival in patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma, PD-L1 CPS of 10 or more, and in all randomised patients regardless of histology, and had a manageable safety profile in the total as-treated population.
Funding
Merck Sharp & Dohme.
Related Questions
In a patient with a mid-esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with tracheal invasion confirmed on bronchoscopy, would you treat with definitive chemo-radiation with curative intent?
I generally start with chemotherapy alone in these patients, usually carbo/taxol for 2-3 months, and then re-evaluate with PET, bronchoscopy, and endoscopy to determine if there is still evidence of transmural invasion into the trachea. Often, if the tumor responds, the tracheal invasion is no longe...
What is your second line therapy for PDL1 negative metastatic squamous esophageal cancer who did not receive a checkpoint inhibitor in first line setting?
I would not personally consider immunotherapy in any context for such a patient. For the purpose of answering this question, I assume that a "PD-L1 negative" tumor refers to a PD-L1 TPS 0% and CPS 0 tumor.As a quick reminder, the 2 relevant studies in the US for 1st-line immunotherapy in ESCC patien...
Based on KEYNOTE-811, would you add pembrolizumab for HER2+ distal esophageal adenocarcinoma with new supraclavicular lymph nodes if treated previously with concurrent chemoradiation and PD-L1 CPS of 3?
There are a few important pieces of information needed to make a good therapeutic decision in this case: Age and comorbidities of the patient, performance status. Duration of progression free interval since finishing Chemo-Rads. What kind of imaging is done to assess extent of disease. Having sai...
What are your considerations for choice of immunotherapy agent with patients with metastatic pMMR HER2- esophageal/GEJ/gastric adenocarcinoma with CPS >=10?
I alluded to this earlier. Although both CheckMate 649 and KEYNOTE 590 included esophageal cancer, there were caveats. Specifically, in CheckMate 649, there were relatively few patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma. The positive results of CM-649 were clearly driven by gastric adenocarcinoma, part...
What impacts your decisions regarding the use of immunotherapy in metastatic G/E/GEJ cancers overall in light of variations in FDA approval, guidelines, and trial data?
The decision really lies in balancing the likelihood of benefit against potential toxicity. Checkpoint inhibition is generally very well tolerated, but there are patients that I am hesitant to consider it, including patients with rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease, or other autoimmune ...