Lancet Oncol. 2020 Mar 12
Pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and docetaxel for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (CLEOPATRA): end-of-study results from a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study.
Abstract
Background
CLEOPATRA was a phase 3 study comparing the efficacy and safety of pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and docetaxel with placebo, trastuzumab, and docetaxel in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. In the primary analysis and subsequent reports, progression-free and overall survival were significantly improved in the pertuzumab group compared with the placebo group. Here, we report the end-of-study analysis of CLEOPATRA.
Methods
This was a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial that was done at 204 centres in 25 countries. Eligible patients were 18 years or older, had HER2-positive, metastatic breast cancer, had not received previous chemotherapy or biological treatment for their metastatic disease, and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. All study drugs were given intravenously, every 3 weeks. Patients were assigned to receive either pertuzumab or placebo at a loading dose of 840 mg, and 420 mg thereafter; plus trastuzumab at 8 mg/kg loading dose and 6 mg/kg thereafter; and docetaxel at 75 mg/m2, escalating to 100 mg/m2 if tolerated. Pertuzumab or placebo and trastuzumab were given until disease progression; docetaxel was given for six cycles, or longer at the investigators' discretion. Randomisation (1:1) was done by use of an interactive voice-response system and was stratified by geographical region (Asia, Europe, North America, or South America) and previous treatment (previous adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy vs none). The primary endpoint was independent review facility-assessed progression-free survival, which has been reported previously. Since the confirmatory overall survival analysis had also occurred before this prespecified end-of-study analysis, analyses presented here are descriptive. Overall survival analyses were based on the intention-to-treat population with crossover patients analysed in the placebo group; analyses were not adjusted for crossover to the pertuzumab group and are likely to be conservative. Safety analyses were based on treatment received; crossover patients were counted in the placebo group up to the day before first pertuzumab dose. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00567190.
Findings
Between Feb 12, 2008, and July 7, 2010, 1196 patients were assessed for eligibility, of whom 808 were enrolled and randomly assigned. 402 patients were assigned to receive docetaxel plus trastuzumab plus pertuzumab, and 406 patients were assigned to receive docetaxel plus trastuzumab plus placebo. Clinical cutoff for this analysis was Nov 23, 2018. Between July 2012 and clinical cutoff, 50 patients crossed from the placebo to the pertuzumab group. Median follow-up was 99·9 months in the pertuzumab group (IQR 92·9-106·4) and 98·7 months (90·9-105·7) in the placebo group. Median overall survival was 57·1 months (95% CI 50-72) in the pertuzumab group and 40·8 months (36-48) in the placebo group (hazard ratio 0·69, 95% CI 0·58-0·82); 8-year landmark overall survival rates were 37% (95% CI 31-42) in the pertuzumab group and 23% (19-28) in the placebo group. The most common grade 3-4 adverse event was neutropenia (200 [49%] of 408 patients in the pertuzumab group, 183 [46%] of 396 patients in the placebo group). Five (1%) of 408 patients in the pertuzumab group and six (2%) of 396 patients in the placebo group had treatment-related deaths. One new serious adverse event suggestive of congestive heart failure (pertuzumab group) and one new symptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction (post-crossover) occurred since the previous analysis.
Interpretation
Our analysis shows that the previously observed improvements in overall survival with pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and docetaxel versus placebo, trastuzumab, and docetaxel were maintained after a median of more than 8 years of follow-up. The long-term safety and cardiac safety profiles of pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and docetaxel were maintained in the overall safety population and within crossover patients. HER2-targeted therapy has changed the natural history of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer, with the dual blockade of pertuzumab and trastuzumab, with docetaxel, demonstrating an 8-year landmark overall survival rate of 37%.
Funding
F Hoffmann-La Roche and Genentech.
Related Questions
In a patient with HER2+ breast cancer who develops metastatic recurrence after receiving neoadjuvant or adjuvant T-DXd, what will then be your approach to first-line metastatic therapy?
This is a newly created clinical scenario. T-DXd was only approved in the (neo)adjuvant setting in May 2026 (neoadjuvant with THP per DESTINY-Breast11, and post-neoadjuvant for residual disease per DESTINY-Breast05). The approach should be individualized.I would first confirm biology at recurrence b...
Is DESTINY Breast-09 data sufficient for T-DXd/P to replace THP as the first line standard of care for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer?
With the impressive improvement in PFS to a 1L PFS to a remarkable 40.7 months, T-DXd + P is definitely an attractive option. However, I do not think this will be an approach I use for all patients. For ER+ patients, a THP induction strategy, followed by maintenance HP + AI and palbociclib, is also ...
What are your top takeaways in Breast Cancer from ASCO 2025?
My Top 3 takeaways in Breast Cancer from ASCO 2025 ASCENT-04: Sacituzumab Govitecan Plus Pembrolizumab as a New First-Line Standard for Metastatic PD-L1-Positive Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC): The treatment landscape for metastatic TNBC continues to evolve rapidly. At ASCO 2025, presentation ...
Do you recommend using a ctDNA assay for a patient with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer in a continued CR to guide decision about whether to stop HER2-directed therapy?
This is a good question and is not a rare situation in the management of HER2+ metastatic breast cancer. Radiographic complete response occurs with first-line treatment in 6-15% (CLEOPATRA, GIM-14, and other trials). Currently, the standard of care is to continue anti-Her2 therapy indefinitely. Howe...
What are your top takeaways in Medical Oncology from SABCS 2024?
I would give the following studies the top 3 in terms of impact: GS2-12:The PATINA study, that tested the use of palbociclib in patients who were on maintenance first-line therapy after induction therapy for metastatic HER2 and hormone receptor-positive breast cancer with taxane or vinorelbine plus ...
How would you treat a newly metastatic ER+ PR+ HER2+ triple positive breast cancer with diffuse symptomatic disease and severe neuropathy from prior adjuvant paclitaxel?
This is a challenging clinical situation where the medical oncologist has to balance the need to rapidly induce a response to relieve the patient's symptoms and the risk of exacerbating the patient's peripheral neuropathy, which may be irreversible. Because of the latter concern, I would avoid stand...
What second line treatment would you choose for a post menopausal woman with HR+ HER2+ metastatic breast cancer with low burden disease treated with first line aromatase inhibitor and trastuzumab?
The TAnDEM trial did prove that triple-positive metastatic breast cancer should be treated with both anti-HER2 therapy and endocrine therapy. Although there is no direct data in the setting of the above-described case to my knowledge, we can extrapolate from the large body of evidence that exists fo...
Would you hold pertuzumab around the time of surgery?
There is no basis for holding pertuzumab at the time of surgery, or for other procedures for safety reasons for patients who are tolerating therapy well. However, for patients who are having significant side effects such as diarrhea that is temporally related to the administration of the drug- or is...
Do you ever stop pertuzumab for stable disease in a patient with metastatic, HER2 positive breast with stable disease?
I would only stop pertuzumab if there is considerable toxicity (rashes, diarrhea, severe infusion reactions, etc). Given the substantial overall survival benefit seen in the CLEOPATRA study, I make every effort to continue both trastuzumab and pertuzumab in patients with metastatic HER2+ breast canc...