Mednet Logo

Abstract

Background

We report the long-term results of a trial of immediate postoperative irradiation versus a wait-and-see policy in patients with prostate cancer extending beyond the prostate, to confirm whether previously reported progression-free survival was sustained.

Methods

This randomised, phase 3, controlled trial recruited patients aged 75 years or younger with untreated cT0-3 prostate cancer (WHO performance status 0 or 1) from 37 institutions across Europe. Eligible patients were randomly assigned centrally (1:1) to postoperative irradiation (60 Gy of conventional irradiation to the surgical bed for 6 weeks) or to a wait-and-see policy until biochemical progression (increase in prostate-specific antigen >0·2 μg/L confirmed twice at least 2 weeks apart). We analysed the primary endpoint, biochemical progression-free survival, by intention to treat (two-sided test for difference at α=0.05, adjusted for one interim analysis) and did exploratory analyses of heterogeneity of effect. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00002511.

Findings

1005 patients were randomly assigned to a wait-and-see policy (n=503) or postoperative irradiation (n=502) and were followed up for a median of 10·6 years (range 2 months to 16·6 years). Postoperative irradiation significantly improved biochemical progression-free survival compared with the wait-and-see policy (198 [39·4%] of 502 patients in postoperative irradiation group vs 311 [61·8%] of 503 patients in wait-and-see group had biochemical or clinical progression or died; HR 0·49 [95% CI 0·41-0·59]; p<0·0001). Late adverse effects (any type of any grade) were more frequent in the postoperative irradiation group than in the wait-and-see group (10 year cumulative incidence 70·8% [66·6-75·0] vs 59·7% [55·3-64·1]; p=0.001).

Interpretation

Results at median follow-up of 10·6 years show that conventional postoperative irradiation significantly improves biochemical progression-free survival and local control compared with a wait-and-see policy, supporting results at 5 year follow-up; however, improvements in clinical progression-free survival were not maintained. Exploratory analyses suggest that postoperative irradiation might improve clinical progression-free survival in patients younger than 70 years and in those with positive surgical margins, but could have a detrimental effect in patients aged 70 years or older.

Funding

Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer (Comité de l'Isère, Grenoble, France) and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Charitable Trust.

Related Questions

What adjuvant treatment would you offer a patient who underwent cystoprostatectomy for a muscle invasive bladder cancer and discovered to also have prostate cancer?

1
3 Answers

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Radiation Oncology · Michigan Healthcare Professionals, PC

Complex case. If they have an indication for prostate RT (major: positive LN, persistent PSA, +SVI, minor: + margins, +ECE), I would consider treating the prostate fossa +/- LNs. As far as the bladder, we don't have the answer yet, but high-risk patients are being studied on the BART study from Tata...

Is there any evidence for combining surgery and XRT +/- ADT for treatment of localized high risk prostate cancer?

2
1 Answers

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Radiation Oncology

Presumably, this is a question inquiring about planned post-operative RT. If so, surgery followed by adjuvant, post-operative radiation therapy (PORT) has been profiled extensively in several RCTs: EORTC 22911, SWOG 8794, ARO 96-02, FinnProstataX. The two more recent trials, ARO 96-02 and FinnProsta...

Are there any situations in which you would offer postoperative RT for node positive prostate cancer?

7
2 Answers

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Radiation Oncology · Emory University School of Medicine

The textbook answer, based on Messing NEJM, is ADT for node+ patients post-prostatectomy, but this is certainly a moving target.As node+ patients were excluded from all adjuvant (EORTC, German, and SWOG) and salvage (RAVES, RTOG 0534) randomized trials, there is currently no level I evidence for XRT...