N Engl J Med 2023 Jun 04
Vorasidenib in IDH1- or IDH2-Mutant Low-Grade Glioma.
Abstract
Background
Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-mutant grade 2 gliomas are malignant brain tumors that cause considerable disability and premature death. Vorasidenib, an oral brain-penetrant inhibitor of mutant IDH1 and IDH2 enzymes, showed preliminary activity in IDH-mutant gliomas.
Methods
In a double-blind, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned patients with residual or recurrent grade 2 IDH-mutant glioma who had undergone no previous treatment other than surgery to receive either oral vorasidenib (40 mg once daily) or matched placebo in 28-day cycles. The primary end point was imaging-based progression-free survival according to blinded assessment by an independent review committee. The key secondary end point was the time to the next anticancer intervention. Crossover to vorasidenib from placebo was permitted on confirmation of imaging-based disease progression. Safety was also assessed.
Results
A total of 331 patients were assigned to receive vorasidenib (168 patients) or placebo (163 patients). At a median follow-up of 14.2 months, 226 patients (68.3%) were continuing to receive vorasidenib or placebo. Progression-free survival was significantly improved in the vorasidenib group as compared with the placebo group (median progression-free survival, 27.7 months vs. 11.1 months; hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.27 to 0.56; P<0.001). The time to the next intervention was significantly improved in the vorasidenib group as compared with the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.15 to 0.43; P<0.001). Adverse events of grade 3 or higher occurred in 22.8% of the patients who received vorasidenib and in 13.5% of those who received placebo. An increased alanine aminotransferase level of grade 3 or higher occurred in 9.6% of the patients who received vorasidenib and in no patients who received placebo.
Conclusions
In patients with grade 2 IDH-mutant glioma, vorasidenib significantly improved progression-free survival and delayed the time to the next intervention. (Funded by Servier; INDIGO ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04164901.).
Related Questions
In what circumstances would you consider use of IDH inhibitors in high-grade astrocytomas?
Please forgive me for the length and directness of my response, but I believe it is important to first go over the INDIGO trial and explain why, in my opinion, it was a highly questionable study, with multiple significant methodological flaws and dubious evidence of Vorasidenib's efficacy.INDIGO tri...
How would you approach a patient over the age of 40 with a sub-totally resected frontal oligodendroglioma, WHO Grade II, 1p/19q co-deleted, IDH mutant, with imaging concerning for second site in the pontomedullary junction?
The pontomedullary junction is not usually amenable to a biopsy (unless the lesion is exophytic); as such, there are 2 possibilities: a) the second lesion is related to the one that has undergone subtotal resection, or b) the lesion is of a different nature. Statistically, it is more likely to be a ...
How would you manage a patient less than 40 years old with an incidentally found LGG, IDH mutated, 1p19q intact, s/p STR?
Update: On August 6, 2024, the FDA approved Vorasidenib for IDH-mutant low-grade gliomas based on findings from the INDIGO trial. This decision highlights the FDA's incompetence and lack of scientific integrity, clearly demonstrating that the agency prioritizes pharmaceutical companies' interests ov...
In a young patient with recurrent low-grade glioma s/p gross total resection, is there any role for further observation instead of radiation and chemotherapy?
As simple as this question seems to be on the surface, it is actually a very difficult clinical scenario to opine with certainty, primarily because of a lack of data. So, let us address this with each option in mind, weighing the pros and cons: Observation: We do know that in resected patients, radi...