Mednet Logo
CommunityRadiation Oncology

What approach do you take to determine dose constraints for conventionally fractionated reirradiation of the head and neck?

Do you have formal constraints and evaluate cumulative doses on the composite plan? Do you use traditional constraints but account for repair?
3 Answers
Mednet Member
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Radiation Oncology · NYC Health + Hospitals
Answered on

Great question, very challenging scenario.

In general, try to minimize the margins for re-RT, and use IGRT, especially if you are close to the neurologic critical structures. (Optics, brainstem, spinal cord, plexus, temporal lobe.)

Specific doses and whether you exceed limits: that really depends on w...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Radiation Oncology · Levine Cancer Institute
Answered on

I wanted to highlight here the 2022 Radium Society AUC document which does contain an attempt at DVH criteria used in the fractionated re-irradiation setting identified during a systematic review.

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Radiation Oncology · Karmanos Cancer Institute - McLaren Proton Therapy Center
Answered on

I try to give full dose if treating for cure, e.g. 70 Gy. I like hyperfractionation as a way to separate the late and acute side effect curves, e.g., 72 Gy in 60 fx BID with cetuximab like Bonner trial. I use the Carsten Nieder constraints for spinal cord, which have 3 key components:

  1. Over 6 months ...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer